Re: [tor-dev] Reg : using the keep alive messages

2011-06-27 Thread Sambuddho Chakravarty
Sorry about the typo..I meant which is the relevant part of the code which I can begin looking into if I want to inject RELAY_DROP cells in a circuit in forward direction (from the OP towards the exit) and backward direction (from exit to OP). Thanks Sambuddho On Fri, Jun 24, 2011 at 8:36 PM, Sam

Re: [tor-dev] Reg : using the keep alive messages

2011-06-24 Thread Sambuddho Chakravarty
Which is the relevant part of the that should I look into for injecting such cells in streams ? Thanks Sambuddho On Thu, Jun 9, 2011 at 3:03 PM, Sambuddho Chakravarty wrote: > Dear Roger > Thanks for your response. I read the spec document about the RELAY_DROP > cells. You say that no one has

Re: [tor-dev] Reg : using the keep alive messages

2011-06-09 Thread Sambuddho Chakravarty
Dear Roger Thanks for your response. I read the spec document about the RELAY_DROP cells. You say that no one has understood the passive correlation attack to utilize the RELAY_DROP cells. I am however little curious to see if "moderate padding" (enough to not mess up QoS of various services) can

Re: [tor-dev] Reg : using the keep alive messages

2011-06-09 Thread Roger Dingledine
On Wed, Jun 08, 2011 at 08:11:58PM -0400, Sambuddho Chakravarty wrote: > Hi All > I read in the Tor design spec that Tor control protocol supports keepalive > messages which could be used for link padding . I wonder if anyone has ever > explored using them... I don't think you mean the Tor control

[tor-dev] Reg : using the keep alive messages

2011-06-08 Thread Sambuddho Chakravarty
Hi All I read in the Tor design spec that Tor control protocol supports keepalive messages which could be used for link padding . I wonder if anyone has ever explored using them... Thanks Sambuddho ___ tor-dev mailing list tor-dev@lists.torproject.org ht