Hi all,
I implemented a prototype obfs3 implementation that uses the UniformDH trick.
It can be found in the `obfs3_take2` branch of
https://git.torproject.org/user/asn/pyobfsproxy.git . gitweb link:
https://gitweb.torproject.org/user/asn/pyobfsproxy.git/shortlog/refs/heads/obfs3_take2
Here is t
Hey Ian,
> [There's no such thing as a "bi-quadratic residue" in this setting; all
> quadratic residues in this group have one square root which is itself a
> quadratic residue and one which is not.]
I guess you are right. Because (q,2) = 1, all quadratic residues are
bi-quadratic residues, hence
Ian Goldberg writes:
> On Wed, Dec 12, 2012 at 04:52:11AM +0200, George Kadianakis wrote:
>> >> > Let p = 3 mod 4 be prime, with q=(p-1)/2 also prime, and p is at least
>> >> > 1536 bits. (2048 if there's room.) [Use group 5 or group 14 from RFC
>> >> > 3526.] Let g be a generator of the order
On Wed, Dec 12, 2012 at 11:14:08AM -0500, vmonmoonsh...@gmail.com wrote:
> >The only issue with your trick, is that I'm not looking forward
> >implementing a custom DH key exchange in Python (especially the DH
> >parameter generation and public key validation parts).
>
> From the conversation of Z
>The only issue with your trick, is that I'm not looking forward
>implementing a custom DH key exchange in Python (especially the DH
>parameter generation and public key validation parts).
>From the conversation of Zack with Steven at the breakfast table at
Hotel Cellai, I'm pretty sure that Stego
On Wed, Dec 12, 2012 at 04:52:11AM +0200, George Kadianakis wrote:
> >> > Let p = 3 mod 4 be prime, with q=(p-1)/2 also prime, and p is at least
> >> > 1536 bits. (2048 if there's room.) [Use group 5 or group 14 from RFC
> >> > 3526.] Let g be a generator of the order-q subgroup of Z_p^* (g=2 fo
Ian Goldberg writes:
> On Wed, Dec 12, 2012 at 03:13:59AM +0200, George Kadianakis wrote:
>> Ian Goldberg writes:
>>
>> > [Should we not be copying tor-dev on this thread?]
>> >
>>
>> We definitely should.
>>
>> Is it OK if I forward the whole thread to tor-dev (including this mail
>> and you
On Wed, Dec 12, 2012 at 03:13:59AM +0200, George Kadianakis wrote:
> Ian Goldberg writes:
>
> > [Should we not be copying tor-dev on this thread?]
> >
>
> We definitely should.
>
> Is it OK if I forward the whole thread to tor-dev (including this mail
> and your reply)? Feel free to do it yours
