On 24/06/14 18:53, Kostas Jakeliunas wrote:
> Hi Karsten,
Hi Kostas,
> On Tue, Jun 17, 2014 at 10:13 AM, Karsten Loesing
> wrote:
>> Hi Kostas,
>>
>> On 11/06/14 04:48, Kostas Jakeliunas wrote:
>>> Hi all!
>>>
>>> On Mon, Jun 9, 2014 at 10:22 AM, Karsten Loesing
>>> wrote:
On 09/06/14 01:
Hi Karsten,
On Tue, Jun 17, 2014 at 10:13 AM, Karsten Loesing
wrote:
> Hi Kostas,
>
> On 11/06/14 04:48, Kostas Jakeliunas wrote:
>> Hi all!
>>
>> On Mon, Jun 9, 2014 at 10:22 AM, Karsten Loesing
>> wrote:
>>> On 09/06/14 01:26, Damian Johnson wrote:
Oh, and another quick thought - you onc
Hi Kostas,
On 11/06/14 04:48, Kostas Jakeliunas wrote:
> Hi all!
>
> On Mon, Jun 9, 2014 at 10:22 AM, Karsten Loesing
> wrote:
>> On 09/06/14 01:26, Damian Johnson wrote:
>>> Oh, and another quick thought - you once mentioned that a descriptor
>>> search service would make ExoneraTor obsolete,
On Tue, Jun 10, 2014 at 10:38 AM, Karsten Loesing
wrote:
> On 10/06/14 05:41, Damian Johnson wrote:
let me make one remark about optimizing Postgres defaults: I wrote quite
a few database queries in the past, and some of them perform horribly
(relay search) whereas others perform re
Hi all!
On Mon, Jun 9, 2014 at 10:22 AM, Karsten Loesing wrote:
> On 09/06/14 01:26, Damian Johnson wrote:
>> Oh, and another quick thought - you once mentioned that a descriptor
>> search service would make ExoneraTor obsolete, and in looking it over
>> I agree. The search functionality ExoneraT
On 10/06/14 18:14, Damian Johnson wrote:
>> ... including searches for other IPv4 addresses in the same
>> /24 and other IPv6 addresses in the same /48.
>
> Ahhh. *That* would indeed make this a lot more of a pita. ExoneraTor
> gives no indication that it accepts /24 or /48 ranges. Is that
> capab
> ... including searches for other IPv4 addresses in the same
> /24 and other IPv6 addresses in the same /48.
Ahhh. *That* would indeed make this a lot more of a pita. ExoneraTor
gives no indication that it accepts /24 or /48 ranges. Is that
capability even used by visitors?
__
On 10/06/14 05:41, Damian Johnson wrote:
>>> let me make one remark about optimizing Postgres defaults: I wrote quite
>>> a few database queries in the past, and some of them perform horribly
>>> (relay search) whereas others perform really well (ExoneraTor). I
>>> believe that the majority of per
>> let me make one remark about optimizing Postgres defaults: I wrote quite
>> a few database queries in the past, and some of them perform horribly
>> (relay search) whereas others perform really well (ExoneraTor). I
>> believe that the majority of performance gains can be achieved by
>> designin
On Mon, Jun 9, 2014 at 3:22 AM, Karsten Loesing wrote:
> let me make one remark about optimizing Postgres defaults: I wrote quite
> a few database queries in the past, and some of them perform horribly
> (relay search) whereas others perform really well (ExoneraTor). I
> believe that the majority
On 09/06/14 01:26, Damian Johnson wrote:
> Oh, and another quick thought - you once mentioned that a descriptor
> search service would make ExoneraTor obsolete, and in looking it over
> I agree. The search functionality ExoneraTor provides is trivial. The
> only reason it requires such a huge datab
On 09/06/14 00:03, Damian Johnson wrote:
> Hi Karsten. This is diving into enough detail that we might as well move this
> over to tor-dev@. For the list's benefit, Karsten and I are discussing a
> Python rewrite of ExoneraTor...
>
> https://exonerator.torproject.org/
> https://gitweb.torproje
Oh, and another quick thought - you once mentioned that a descriptor
search service would make ExoneraTor obsolete, and in looking it over
I agree. The search functionality ExoneraTor provides is trivial. The
only reason it requires such a huge database is because it's storing a
copy of every descr
Hi Karsten. This is diving into enough detail that we might as well move this
over to tor-dev@. For the list's benefit, Karsten and I are discussing a
Python rewrite of ExoneraTor...
https://exonerator.torproject.org/
https://gitweb.torproject.org/exonerator.git
First I think I need to take
14 matches
Mail list logo
