Hi Karsten and metrics,
> On 13 Sep 2017, at 04:27, Karsten Loesing wrote:
>
> Hi Tim,
>
> unfortunately, nobody from the metrics team can attend today's proposal
> 280 discussion in a few hours.
We turned on meetbot!
The meeting action items are:
• write a k-of-n secret sharing spec
Hi Tim,
unfortunately, nobody from the metrics team can attend today's proposal
280 discussion in a few hours.
That's why we decided to provide some written feedback here.
We didn't find anything problematic in the proposal from the view of Tor
metrics.
This is due to the narrow scope covering
> On 8 Aug 2017, at 03:50, Nick Mathewson wrote:
>
> [reposting this message with permission. It is a reply that I sent to
> Aaron, where I quoted an email from him about this proposal. Tim and
> Aaron had additional responses, which I'll let them quote here or not
> as they think best.]
[Re-p
[reposting this message with permission. It is a reply that I sent to
Aaron, where I quoted an email from him about this proposal. Tim and
Aaron had additional responses, which I'll let them quote here or not
as they think best.]
On Sat, Aug 5, 2017 at 1:38 PM, Aaron Johnson
wrote:
[...]
> - T
Hi! Tim helped me write this this draft last week, and I shared it
with the PrivCount authors. I've already gotten some good comments
from Aaron, which I'll repost in a followup message, with his
permission.
Filename: 280-privcount-in-tor.txt
Title: Privacy-Pres