On Mon, Oct 15, 2012 at 2:48 PM, Mike Perry wrote:
[...]
> Again, this experimentation is already done. It's quite clear that
> adding more objects to the world of Guard activity reduces traffic
> fingerprinting accuracy, regardless of if that activity is concurrent
> with client traffic or not.
Thus spake Nick Mathewson (ni...@alum.mit.edu):
> On Fri, Oct 12, 2012 at 10:53 PM, Mike Perry wrote:
> > Thus spake Nick Mathewson (ni...@alum.mit.edu):
> >
> >> On Fri, Oct 12, 2012 at 3:17 PM, Mike Perry
> >> wrote:
> >> > Thus spake Nick Mathewson (ni...@torproject.org):
> >> >> Discussion:
On Fri, Oct 12, 2012 at 10:53 PM, Mike Perry wrote:
> Thus spake Nick Mathewson (ni...@alum.mit.edu):
>
>> On Fri, Oct 12, 2012 at 3:17 PM, Mike Perry wrote:
>> > Thus spake Nick Mathewson (ni...@torproject.org):
>> >> Discussion:
>> >>
>> >>The rule that the set of guards and the set of dire
Thus spake Nick Mathewson (ni...@alum.mit.edu):
> On Fri, Oct 12, 2012 at 3:17 PM, Mike Perry wrote:
> > Thus spake Nick Mathewson (ni...@torproject.org):
> >> Discussion:
> >>
> >>The rule that the set of guards and the set of directory guards need to
> >>be disjoint, and the rule that m
On Fri, Oct 12, 2012 at 3:17 PM, Mike Perry wrote:
> Thus spake Nick Mathewson (ni...@torproject.org):
>> Discussion:
>>
>>The rule that the set of guards and the set of directory guards need to
>>be disjoint, and the rule that multiple directory guards need to be
>>providing descripto
Thus spake Nick Mathewson (ni...@torproject.org):
> Filename: 207-directory-guards.txt
> Title: Directory guards
>
> Motivation:
>
>When we added guard nodes to resist profiling attacks, we made it so
>that clients won't build general-purpose circuits through just any
>node. But cli
Filename: 207-directory-guards.txt
Title: Directory guards
Author: Nick Mathewson
Created: 10-Oct-2012
Status: Open
Target: 0.2.4.x
Motivation:
When we added guard nodes to resist profiling attacks, we made it so
that clients won't build general-purpose circuits through just any
node.
