On Wed, Jul 11, 2012 at 11:09 AM, Nick Mathewson wrote:
> Then I see no reason not to accept this proposal. Does anyone else?
>
Actually, there's a detail to think about: Isolation. If I connect to
foo.a.onion bar.a.onion, should those streams be allowed to go
over the same circuit? Ri
On Tue, Jul 10, 2012 at 7:24 AM, Karsten Loesing wrote:
> On 7/7/12 7:06 PM, Nick Mathewson wrote:
>> The only part I'm worried about here is that we had once considered
>> doing authenticated hidden services or some other kind of wacky hidden
>> service with a design like "b.a
On 7/7/12 7:06 PM, Nick Mathewson wrote:
> The only part I'm worried about here is that we had once considered
> doing authenticated hidden services or some other kind of wacky hidden
> service with a design like "b.aaa.onion", where
> b is some additional data to use in
On Fri, Jul 6, 2012 at 10:23 AM, wrote:
> Hello!
>
> As discussed with a few people at the Florence Hackfest, here's a quick
> proposal
> for subdomain support on Hidden Service addresses. The implementation seems
> pretty
> straightforward (a patch will follow).
>
> Please forgive me if the pr
