> On 2 Nov 2017, at 07:22, Nick Mathewson wrote:
>
>> On Tue, Oct 24, 2017 at 11:35 PM, teor wrote:
>> Hi all,
>>
>> We would like to move IPv6 ORPorts from microdescriptors to the
>> microdesc consensus. This makes it easier for IPv6 clients to bootstrap
>> and choose reachable guards.
>>
>>
On Tue, Oct 24, 2017 at 11:35 PM, teor wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> We would like to move IPv6 ORPorts from microdescriptors to the
> microdesc consensus. This makes it easier for IPv6 clients to bootstrap
> and choose reachable guards.
>
> The proposal is inlined below, it is also available with the cor
> On 25 Oct 2017, at 14:35, teor wrote:
>
> This change removes 2-50 bytes from the microdescriptors of relays that
> have an IPv6 ORPort, and adds them to reachable IPv6 relays' microdesc
> consensus entries.
For the record, the byte figures here is wrong, it should read "7-50 bytes"
or
On Tue, Oct 24, 2017 at 11:35 PM, teor wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> We would like to move IPv6 ORPorts from microdescriptors to the
> microdesc consensus. This makes it easier for IPv6 clients to bootstrap
> and choose reachable guards.
>
> The proposal is inlined below, it is also available with the cor
Hi all,
We would like to move IPv6 ORPorts from microdescriptors to the
microdesc consensus. This makes it easier for IPv6 clients to bootstrap
and choose reachable guards.
The proposal is inlined below, it is also available with the corresponding
dir-spec updates in my torspec branch bug23826-23
