Re: [tor-dev] Proposal: Link Cryptographic Agility

2015-11-16 Thread Yawning Angel
On Mon, 16 Nov 2015 21:58:41 + isis wrote: > Hey Yawning, > > I'm generally in favour of merging this, but I'll wait a couple days > to see if anyone has any feedback. Particularly, I'd like to hear if > Nick has any comments. I talked to Nick about this, and now think that adding a line or

Re: [tor-dev] Proposal: Link Cryptographic Agility

2015-11-16 Thread isis
Hey Yawning, I'm generally in favour of merging this, but I'll wait a couple days to see if anyone has any feedback. Particularly, I'd like to hear if Nick has any comments. Some brief comments/questions inline: Yawning Angel transcribed 5.7K bytes: > Hello, > > There's been talk of moving to a

[tor-dev] Proposal: Link Cryptographic Agility

2015-11-15 Thread Yawning Angel
Hello, There's been talk of moving to a wide block construct for cell crypto (#5460), and for adding PQ Forward Secrecy to traffic (#17272). To facilitate this, there needs to be a method for negotiating which primitives a given relay supports. To that end, here's the begining of a proposal (ten