On 11 Oct 2014, at 01:14, Virgil Griffith wrote:
> Will a longer version of this paper be coming out, particularly one for
> developers?
I don’t have any immediate plans to do so, as my current thinking is it would
end up being a queuing theory tutorial with the current paper appended, and
pl
On Sun, Oct 12, 2014 at 06:43:10AM +1100, teor wrote:
>
> On 11 Oct 2014, at 23:00 , tor-dev-requ...@lists.torproject.org wrote:
>
> > Date: Fri, 10 Oct 2014 14:33:52 +0100
> > From: Steven Murdoch
> >
> > I?ve just published a new paper on selecting the node selection
> > probabilities (consen
On 11 Oct 2014, at 23:00 , tor-dev-requ...@lists.torproject.org wrote:
> Date: Fri, 10 Oct 2014 14:33:52 +0100
> From: Steven Murdoch
> To: tor-dev@lists.torproject.org
> Subject: [tor-dev] Optimising Tor node selection probabilities
> Message-ID:
> Content-Type: text/plai
Will a longer version of this paper be coming out, particularly one for
developers?
-V
___
tor-dev mailing list
tor-dev@lists.torproject.org
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-dev
I’ve just published a new paper on selecting the node selection probabilities
(consensus weights) in Tor. It takes a queuing-theory approach and shows that
what Tor used to do (distributing traffic to nodes in proportion to their
contribution to network capacity) is not the best approach.
Count
