Re: [tor-dev] New documentation for Tor Metrics website

2014-12-02 Thread Karsten Loesing
On 28/11/14 06:06, Virgil Griffith wrote: > At the top of the page, > >> *And if you come across something that is missing here, please let us know. > > > For "let us know", put an href to an email address/contact-info for > submitting ideas. Indeed, good catch. I'm currently talking to other

Re: [tor-dev] New documentation for Tor Metrics website

2014-11-27 Thread Virgil Griffith
At the top of the page, > *And if you come across something that is missing here, please let us know. For "let us know", put an href to an email address/contact-info for submitting ideas. -V ___ tor-dev mailing list tor-dev@lists.torproject.org https

Re: [tor-dev] New documentation for Tor Metrics website

2014-11-25 Thread Harmony
Karsten Loesing: >> 1. "Statistics include subsets of relays or bridges by...country code >> (only relays and only until February 2013)..." >> >> Do you mean here "from the beginning of time until Feb '13" or "from >> present day back as far as Feb '13"? I guess it would be clear from >> context, b

Re: [tor-dev] New documentation for Tor Metrics website

2014-11-25 Thread Karsten Loesing
On 24/11/14 18:58, Harmony wrote: > Karsten Loesing: >> Dear list, > > Dear Karsten! Dear Harmony! >> writing documentation is hard work. I'm sure you already knew that, but >> let me re-assure you that I now believe it, too. At least until I >> forget it again and carelessly start documenting

Re: [tor-dev] New documentation for Tor Metrics website

2014-11-24 Thread Harmony
Harmony: > I had a look through and I didn't make any drastic changes, just picked > a few small nits. I attach a patch file for your reading pleasure. Let > me know if you disagree with anything or my changes have made things > even less clear. I attach a better patch file, following advice that

Re: [tor-dev] New documentation for Tor Metrics website

2014-11-24 Thread Harmony
Karsten Loesing: > Dear list, Dear Karsten! > writing documentation is hard work. I'm sure you already knew that, but > let me re-assure you that I now believe it, too. At least until I > forget it again and carelessly start documenting something else that > looks tiny and friendly and trivial

Re: [tor-dev] New documentation for Tor Metrics website

2014-11-22 Thread Karsten Loesing
On 21/11/14 23:05, Lei Yang wrote: > Dear Dr. Loesing, > > I have a concern about the consensus_weight. The definition of it seems > that the consensus_weight is a completely measured value by the > authorities. However, from the Bandwidth Scanner Specification, if I > understand correctly, it loo

Re: [tor-dev] New documentation for Tor Metrics website

2014-11-21 Thread Lei Yang
Dear Dr. Loesing, I have a concern about the consensus_weight. The definition of it seems that the consensus_weight is a completely measured value by the authorities. However, from the Bandwidth Scanner Specification, if I understand correctly, it looks like a combination of observed bandwidth and

[tor-dev] New documentation for Tor Metrics website

2014-11-21 Thread Karsten Loesing
Dear list, writing documentation is hard work. I'm sure you already knew that, but let me re-assure you that I now believe it, too. At least until I forget it again and carelessly start documenting something else that looks tiny and friendly and trivial to document. Anyway, I spent the last day