Re: [tor-dev] License for flash proxy software

2012-07-16 Thread David Fifield
On Tue, Jul 10, 2012 at 02:50:44PM -0700, David Fifield wrote: > I feel there should be a LICENSE file in the flash proxy client packages > currently at http://www.bamsoftware.com/dist/flashproxy/. What is the > recommended practice? Right now the files carry no license. I would be > happy with any

Re: [tor-dev] License for flash proxy software

2012-07-11 Thread Damian Johnson
> [Also, GPL can be hella annoying to change in the future once you have > merged patches from other contributors. Make total destroy the Copyright > State.]" Personally I go with GPL for my projects. Here's how I'm trying to address the above and keep the flexibility to change it in the future...

Re: [tor-dev] License for flash proxy software

2012-07-10 Thread Mike Perry
Thus spake David Fifield (da...@bamsoftware.com): > I feel there should be a LICENSE file in the flash proxy client packages > currently at http://www.bamsoftware.com/dist/flashproxy/. What is the > recommended practice? Right now the files carry no license. I would be > happy with anything that i

[tor-dev] License for flash proxy software

2012-07-10 Thread David Fifield
I feel there should be a LICENSE file in the flash proxy client packages currently at http://www.bamsoftware.com/dist/flashproxy/. What is the recommended practice? Right now the files carry no license. I would be happy with anything that is free software and convenient to the Tor Project. For exam