> My hesitation to begin with anything at all was that I was not sure
> to go directly into resolving bugs, I thought maybe prior knowledge of
> networking & protocols (in-depth) was very necessary.
Nope. The best approach is to just jump right in and try to make
something better. We're more than
Thanks 'atagar'! I've already been through the links that you gave me...
My hesitation to begin with anything at all was that I was not sure
to go directly into resolving bugs, I thought maybe prior knowledge of
networking & protocols (in-depth) was very necessary. But now that
I think of it, this
> Damian, do you think we could add a prominent sentence or two to our
> gsoc page to clarify this point?
Good idea. Done...
https://lists.torproject.org/pipermail/tor-commits/2013-March/053531.html
___
tor-dev mailing list
tor-dev@lists.torproject.org
On Sun, Mar 10, 2013 at 2:52 PM, Nick Mathewson wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 10, 2013 at 1:31 PM, Damian Johnson wrote:
>> Hi Ashish, glad you want to get involved with Tor for GSoC!
>
> We should be very clear to mention this:
>
> The organizations participating in 2013 GSoC have NOT been announced
> ye
On Sun, Mar 10, 2013 at 1:31 PM, Damian Johnson wrote:
> Hi Ashish, glad you want to get involved with Tor for GSoC!
We should be very clear to mention this:
The organizations participating in 2013 GSoC have NOT been announced
yet. While we don't think we've done anything that would make Google
Hi Ashish, glad you want to get involved with Tor for GSoC! The first
step would be to look over the projects that you're interested in, and
try to make a small contribution or two. George is the maintainer of
Obfsproxy (asn on irc) and I'm the maintainer of Stem (atagar on irc).
Here's some links
Hello! I am a newbie & very eager to contribute to Tor development.
I have been using tor since a year and a half & I have been looking around the
website & the source codes since past month.
The upcoming GSoC has provided a very nice opportunity for me contribute to
whatever extent I can.
I have
