On 15 Dec (04:31:45), teor wrote:
> On 15 Dec 2017, at 04:04, David Goulet wrote:
>
> >> On 15 Dec (03:47:25), teor wrote:
> >>
> On 15 Dec 2017, at 03:29, David Goulet wrote:
> >>>
> >>> The place I'm thinking of is the EXTEND in IPv6 and relay self-testing in
> >>> IPv6. This seems a mo
On 15 Dec 2017, at 04:04, David Goulet wrote:
>> On 15 Dec (03:47:25), teor wrote:
>>
On 15 Dec 2017, at 03:29, David Goulet wrote:
>>>
>>> The place I'm thinking of is the EXTEND in IPv6 and relay self-testing in
>>> IPv6. This seems a more critical point to build into the network before
On 15 Dec (03:47:25), teor wrote:
>
> > On 15 Dec 2017, at 03:29, David Goulet wrote:
> >
> > The place I'm thinking of is the EXTEND in IPv6 and relay self-testing in
> > IPv6. This seems a more critical point to build into the network before we
> > can
> > start building HS support on top (si
> On 15 Dec 2017, at 03:29, David Goulet wrote:
>
> The place I'm thinking of is the EXTEND in IPv6 and relay self-testing in
> IPv6. This seems a more critical point to build into the network before we can
> start building HS support on top (single onion is different but will have to
> do with
On 12 Dec (09:54:43), teor wrote:
> Hi David (and others interested in IPv6),
>
> We want to add better IPv6 support to Tor relays, clients, and v3 onion
> services.
>
> But if we do IPv6 v3 onion services first, the hop before intro and rend
> points
> will know that the circuit is a v3 onion
Hi David (and others interested in IPv6),
We want to add better IPv6 support to Tor relays, clients, and v3 onion
services.
But if we do IPv6 v3 onion services first, the hop before intro and rend points
will know that the circuit is a v3 onion service circuit, because its EXTEND2
cells will hav
