Re: [tor-dev] Globe without search term

2013-08-15 Thread Christian
On 14.08.2013 10:38, Karsten Loesing wrote: On 8/13/13 10:43 PM, Christian wrote: On 13.08.2013 09:20, Karsten Loesing wrote: On 8/12/13 10:56 PM, Christian wrote: I've seen that you've included the field parameter to limit the fields that onionoo returns. Do you think it would be better to us

Re: [tor-dev] Globe without search term

2013-08-14 Thread Karsten Loesing
On 8/13/13 10:43 PM, Christian wrote: > On 13.08.2013 09:20, Karsten Loesing wrote: >> On 8/12/13 10:56 PM, Christian wrote: >>> I've seen that you've included the field parameter to limit the fields >>> that onionoo returns. >>> Do you think it would be better to use the field parameter and show a

Re: [tor-dev] Globe without search term

2013-08-13 Thread Christian
On 13.08.2013 09:20, Karsten Loesing wrote: On 8/12/13 10:56 PM, Christian wrote: I've seen that you've included the field parameter to limit the fields that onionoo returns. Do you think it would be better to use the field parameter and show a limited amount of data or try to get everything and

Re: [tor-dev] Globe without search term

2013-08-13 Thread Karsten Loesing
On 8/12/13 10:56 PM, Christian wrote: > I've seen that you've included the field parameter to limit the fields > that onionoo returns. > Do you think it would be better to use the field parameter and show a > limited amount of data or try to get everything and only display the > fields that have a

Re: [tor-dev] Globe without search term

2013-08-12 Thread Christian
On 12.08.2013 08:23, Karsten Loesing wrote: 21:43 #tor-dev: < rndm> karsten, looks like this now if it gets the maximum number of results http://globe.rndm.de/#/search/query= You're not online now, so replying via email: Looks really good! Mino

[tor-dev] Globe without search term

2013-08-11 Thread Karsten Loesing
21:43 #tor-dev: < rndm> karsten, looks like this now if it gets the maximum number of results http://globe.rndm.de/#/search/query= You're not online now, so replying via email: Looks really good! Minor tweaks to the phrasing: "To avoid too many re