On Mon, Jan 30, 2012 at 8:23 AM, Mike Perry wrote:
> Thus spake K. Macy (km...@freebsd.org):
>
>> On Fri, Jan 20, 2012 at 11:35 PM, Steven Murdoch wrote:
>> >
>> > One hop-by-hop transport protocol we will likely be considering for an
>> > alternative Tor transport is TCP, and Kip Macy (a FreeBSD
Thus spake K. Macy (km...@freebsd.org):
> On Fri, Jan 20, 2012 at 11:35 PM, Steven Murdoch wrote:
> >
> > One hop-by-hop transport protocol we will likely be considering for an
> > alternative Tor transport is TCP, and Kip Macy (a FreeBSD developer, Cc'd)
> > has been working on porting the Free
On Sat, Jan 21, 2012 at 08:09:58PM +0100, K. Macy wrote:
> I felt it premature to publicly discuss using my user level network
> stack as the basis for a tor transport given the number of potential
> candidates and the issues that I raise below. However, Sebastian felt
> strongly that it belongs on
I felt it premature to publicly discuss using my user level network
stack as the basis for a tor transport given the number of potential
candidates and the issues that I raise below. However, Sebastian felt
strongly that it belongs on tor-dev.
Cheers
-- Forwarded message --
From:
