Re: [tor-dev] Dusting off dir-spec.txt

2014-01-17 Thread Karsten Loesing
On 1/16/14 8:59 PM, Nick Mathewson wrote: > On Tue, Jan 14, 2014 at 1:56 PM, Karsten Loesing > wrote: > [...] >> (Let me know if you prefer this review to happen in a ticket rather than >> here.) >> > > Thanks, Karsten! I think it should ideally be a ticket? Sure. I created #10645 for this.

Re: [tor-dev] Dusting off dir-spec.txt

2014-01-16 Thread Nick Mathewson
On Tue, Jan 14, 2014 at 1:56 PM, Karsten Loesing wrote: [...] > (Let me know if you prefer this review to happen in a ticket rather than > here.) > Thanks, Karsten! I think it should ideally be a ticket? -- Nick ___ tor-dev mailing list tor-dev@list

Re: [tor-dev] Dusting off dir-spec.txt

2014-01-14 Thread Karsten Loesing
On 1/6/14 6:04 PM, Nick Mathewson wrote: > On Sun, Jan 5, 2014 at 2:56 AM, Karsten Loesing > wrote: >> [Re-sending, because my first attempt apparently got lost somewhere. >> Apologies if gets found and this is now a duplicate.] >> >> >> Hi devs, hi dir-spec.txt authors, > [...] >> Would you acc

Re: [tor-dev] Dusting off dir-spec.txt

2014-01-07 Thread Karsten Loesing
On 1/6/14 7:58 PM, Nick Mathewson wrote: > On Sun, Jan 5, 2014 at 2:56 AM, Karsten Loesing > wrote: >> [Re-sending, because my first attempt apparently got lost somewhere. >> Apologies if gets found and this is now a duplicate.] >> >> >> Hi devs, hi dir-spec.txt authors, >> >> when I reviewed the

Re: [tor-dev] Dusting off dir-spec.txt

2014-01-07 Thread Karsten Loesing
On 1/6/14 6:04 PM, Nick Mathewson wrote: > On Sun, Jan 5, 2014 at 2:56 AM, Karsten Loesing > wrote: >> [Re-sending, because my first attempt apparently got lost somewhere. >> Apologies if gets found and this is now a duplicate.] >> >> >> Hi devs, hi dir-spec.txt authors, > [...] >> Would you acc

Re: [tor-dev] Dusting off dir-spec.txt

2014-01-06 Thread Damian Johnson
> Rationale: It is much more difficult to review patches that move and > edit than patches which only move things. I hate to +1 threads but I was thinking the same when this was first proposed. I read all control-spec and dir-spec commits to determine if they impact Stem. Making reformatting chang

Re: [tor-dev] Dusting off dir-spec.txt

2014-01-06 Thread Nick Mathewson
On Sun, Jan 5, 2014 at 2:56 AM, Karsten Loesing wrote: > [Re-sending, because my first attempt apparently got lost somewhere. > Apologies if gets found and this is now a duplicate.] > > > Hi devs, hi dir-spec.txt authors, > > when I reviewed the open proposals related to the directory protocol, I

Re: [tor-dev] Dusting off dir-spec.txt

2014-01-06 Thread Nick Mathewson
On Sun, Jan 5, 2014 at 2:56 AM, Karsten Loesing wrote: > [Re-sending, because my first attempt apparently got lost somewhere. > Apologies if gets found and this is now a duplicate.] > > > Hi devs, hi dir-spec.txt authors, [...] > Would you accept patches making these changes? I'm okay with re-or

Re: [tor-dev] Dusting off dir-spec.txt

2014-01-05 Thread Damian Johnson
> For example, status opinions (proposal 147)... Hi Karsten. Just looked at 147 to figure out the context for overhauling the dir-spec and I'm curious about if we really need a new document type for this. I'm not clear from the proposal - which problem are we trying to solve? 1. Relays publish th

[tor-dev] Dusting off dir-spec.txt

2014-01-05 Thread Karsten Loesing
[Re-sending, because my first attempt apparently got lost somewhere. Apologies if gets found and this is now a duplicate.] Hi devs, hi dir-spec.txt authors, when I reviewed the open proposals related to the directory protocol, I wondered how to integrate the proposed changes into dir-spec.txt.