On Sat, Dec 10, 2011 at 12:19 PM, Ralf-Philipp Weinmann
wrote:
>
> On Dec 10, 2011, at 4:07 PM, Robert Ransom wrote:
>
>> On 2011-12-06, Aaron wrote:
>>
>>> How does IPv6 affect address datamining of https distribution?
>>> A user may be allocated a /128, or a /64.
>>> An
On Dec 10, 2011, at 4:07 PM, Robert Ransom wrote:
> On 2011-12-06, Aaron wrote:
>
>>How does IPv6 affect address datamining of https distribution?
>> A user may be allocated a /128, or a /64.
>> An adversary may control a /32 or perhaps larger
>> Proposal: Ena
On 2011-12-06, Aaron wrote:
> How does IPv6 affect address datamining of https distribution?
> A user may be allocated a /128, or a /64.
> An adversary may control a /32 or perhaps larger
> Proposal: Enable reCAPTCHA support by default.
How much would it cos
Thanks for your feedback!
On Tue, Dec 6, 2011 at 1:45 AM, Linus Nordberg wrote:
> Aaron wrote
> Mon, 5 Dec 2011 16:38:49 -0800:
>
> | IPv6 Addresses are stored as strings, the same way as IPv4 addresses.
> | #XXX: is this better than using the ipaddr.IPAddress class?
>
> What kind of
Aaron wrote
Mon, 5 Dec 2011 16:38:49 -0800:
| IPv6 Addresses are stored as strings, the same way as IPv4 addresses.
| #XXX: is this better than using the ipaddr.IPAddress class?
What kind of database is this? If it is possible to use the rest of the
database for a program written in
Attached is a draft document describing proposed changes to BridgeDB to
accommodate the new or-address spec (186-multiple-orports.txt) and IPv6 bridges.
I am especially interested in comments on sections tagged #XXX.
Thanks!
--Aaron
Filename: xxx-bridgedb-learns-ipv6.txt
Title: BridgeDB Learns I
