> On 6 Nov. 2016, at 02:30, ban...@openmailbox.org wrote:
>
> On 2016-11-05 01:36, teor wrote:
>>> On 5 Nov. 2016, at 11:26, Patrick Schleizer
>>> wrote:
>>> Thank you for your answers!
>>> teor:
* Caching of DNS, HS descriptors, preemptive circuits, etc.
>>> Can you please elaborate on 'e
On 2016-11-05 01:36, teor wrote:
On 5 Nov. 2016, at 11:26, Patrick Schleizer
wrote:
Thank you for your answers!
teor:
* Caching of DNS, HS descriptors, preemptive circuits, etc.
Can you please elaborate on 'etc.'?
I am asking because stream isolation for DNS already has a ticket:
https://
> On 5 Nov. 2016, at 11:26, Patrick Schleizer
> wrote:
>
> Thank you for your answers!
>
> teor:
>> * Caching of DNS, HS descriptors, preemptive circuits, etc.
>
> Can you please elaborate on 'etc.'?
>
> I am asking because stream isolation for DNS already has a ticket:
> https://trac.torpr
Thank you for your answers!
teor:
> * Caching of DNS, HS descriptors, preemptive circuits, etc.
Can you please elaborate on 'etc.'?
I am asking because stream isolation for DNS already has a ticket:
https://trac.torproject.org/projects/tor/ticket/20555
HS cache isolation also has a ticket:
htt
On 21/10/16 21:38, ban...@openmailbox.org wrote:
> Cons:
> *Some unforeseen way malicious VM "X" can link activities of or
> influence traffic of VM "Y"
> **Maybe sending NEWNYM requests in a timed pattern that changes exit IPs
> of VM Y's traffic, revealing they are behind the same client?
> **May
> On 22 Oct. 2016, at 07:38, ban...@openmailbox.org wrote:
>
> Summarized question:
>
> Do you recommend allowing Workstation VMs of different security levels to
> communicate with the same Tor instance? Note that they connect via separate
> internal networks to the Gateway and have different
Summarized question:
Do you recommend allowing Workstation VMs of different security levels
to communicate with the same Tor instance? Note that they connect via
separate internal networks to the Gateway and have different interfaces
& controlports so inter-workstation communication should not