Re: [tor-dev] Configuring Single Onion Services

2016-04-11 Thread David Goulet
On 12 Apr (10:48:37), Tim Wilson-Brown - teor wrote: > > > On 12 Apr 2016, at 04:22, David Goulet wrote: > > > > On 08 Apr (10:15:19), Tim Wilson-Brown - teor wrote: > >> Hi All, > >> > >> I'm working on proposal 260's Rendezvous Single Onion Services in #17178. > >> > >> They are faster, beca

Re: [tor-dev] Configuring Single Onion Services

2016-04-11 Thread Ivan Markin
Tim Wilson-Brown - teor: > We tried adding NonAnonymous to the name, and it was unwieldy. And it > also confuses the semantics: what if we have multiple types of > SingleOnionMode? If we do have multiple types of SingleOnionMode we should specify this type as a value to NonAnonymousOnionServiceMod

Re: [tor-dev] Configuring Single Onion Services

2016-04-11 Thread Tim Wilson-Brown - teor
> On 12 Apr 2016, at 10:49, Ivan Markin wrote: > > David Goulet: >> It's a bit weird to have to enable two options for one feature (single onion) >> BUT I like the double torrc option forcing the users to understand what's >> going on (also adding semantic to the config file). >> >> Bikesheding

Re: [tor-dev] Configuring Single Onion Services

2016-04-11 Thread Ivan Markin
David Goulet: > It's a bit weird to have to enable two options for one feature (single onion) > BUT I like the double torrc option forcing the users to understand what's > going on (also adding semantic to the config file). > > Bikesheding: the name though could be a bit misleading. What if that t

Re: [tor-dev] Configuring Single Onion Services

2016-04-11 Thread Tim Wilson-Brown - teor
> On 12 Apr 2016, at 04:22, David Goulet wrote: > > On 08 Apr (10:15:19), Tim Wilson-Brown - teor wrote: >> Hi All, >> >> I'm working on proposal 260's Rendezvous Single Onion Services in #17178. >> >> They are faster, because they have one hop between the service and the >> introduction and

Re: [tor-dev] Configuring Single Onion Services

2016-04-11 Thread David Goulet
On 08 Apr (10:15:19), Tim Wilson-Brown - teor wrote: > Hi All, > > I'm working on proposal 260's Rendezvous Single Onion Services in #17178. > > They are faster, because they have one hop between the service and the > introduction and rendezvous points. > But this means that their location is ea

Re: [tor-dev] Configuring Single Onion Services

2016-04-08 Thread Virgil Griffith
For whatever it's worth I never found the compile-time option for tor2web mode to be offensive. I remember Roger's original rebuttal against tor2web mode was, "Virgil, I'm not going to make a 'Make Tor Go Faster Button' to be pressed by people who don't know what they are doing." I always thought

Re: [tor-dev] Configuring Single Onion Services

2016-04-08 Thread George Kadianakis
Tim Wilson-Brown - teor writes: > [ text/plain ] > Hi All, > > I'm working on proposal 260's Rendezvous Single Onion Services in #17178. > > They are faster, because they have one hop between the service and the > introduction and rendezvous points. > But this means that their location is easy t

[tor-dev] Configuring Single Onion Services

2016-04-07 Thread Tim Wilson-Brown - teor
Hi All, I'm working on proposal 260's Rendezvous Single Onion Services in #17178. They are faster, because they have one hop between the service and the introduction and rendezvous points. But this means that their location is easy to discover (non-anonymous). So we want to come up with a design