Re: [tor-dev] Combining obfsproxy+scramblesuit with OpenVPN

2014-04-17 Thread irregulator
On 03/10/2014 05:56 AM, Yawning Angel wrote: > > https://github.com/Yawning/openvpn/commit/7474f1acfc5d296289f3f65566184ea699e1896c > > That should work, I'll open a pull request, but I'm not going to > spend more time on it, and there's no guarantee that they will > accept it. > > Regards, >

Re: [tor-dev] Combining obfsproxy+scramblesuit with OpenVPN

2014-03-11 Thread George Kadianakis
irregula...@riseup.net writes: > Hello people, > > I'm investigating how may we combine the traffic obfuscation provided by > obfsproxy+scramblesuit with OpenVPN instead of Tor. > > I completely understand how this combination does not provide anonymity, > but nevertheless I think it will be of so

Re: [tor-dev] Combining obfsproxy+scramblesuit with OpenVPN

2014-03-09 Thread Yawning Angel
On Mon, 10 Mar 2014 01:57:11 + Yawning Angel wrote: > The moment the OpenVPN people fix their broken SOCKS client to not > offer to negotiate an authentication method that they can't actually > use due to missing parameters, this will work as expected. https://github.com/Yawning/openvpn/comm

Re: [tor-dev] Combining obfsproxy+scramblesuit with OpenVPN

2014-03-09 Thread Yawning Angel
On Mon, 10 Mar 2014 03:27:12 +0200 irregula...@riseup.net wrote: > Are we sure it's an OpenVPN bug? Cause I'm getting a : > > "socks_handshake: server asked for username/login auth but we were not > provided any credentials" > > which kind of makes sense regarding the methods' priority in socks5

Re: [tor-dev] Combining obfsproxy+scramblesuit with OpenVPN

2014-03-09 Thread irregulator
On 03/07/2014 12:10 AM, Yawning Angel wrote: > > Looking at the OpenVPN source (src/openvpn/socks.c): > >> const ssize_t size = send (sd, "\x05\x02\x00\x02", 4, MSG_NOSIGNAL); > > The method selection request is hardcoded to always claim support for > No Auth, and Username/Password Auth in that

Re: [tor-dev] Combining obfsproxy+scramblesuit with OpenVPN

2014-03-06 Thread Yawning Angel
On Thu, 06 Mar 2014 19:22:16 +0200 irregulator wrote: > On 03/05/2014 07:58 PM, Yawning Angel wrote: > Hey people thanks for your input, > > I'm actually passing password inline while starting obfsproxy > (client-side) like that : > > python pyobfsproxy.py --log-min-severity=info scramblesuit --

Re: [tor-dev] Combining obfsproxy+scramblesuit with OpenVPN

2014-03-06 Thread irregulator
On 03/05/2014 07:58 PM, Yawning Angel wrote: > >> So, while testing OpenVPN with obfsproxy and the latest patch, the vpn >> client enters the authentication phase. > Yay. > >> Do the credentials depend on the pluggable transport in use by the >> obfsproxy? > Yes. It only should happen for obfs2 (i

Re: [tor-dev] Combining obfsproxy+scramblesuit with OpenVPN

2014-03-05 Thread Jurre van Bergen
Heya, The company I work for is building an OpenVPN client which has obfsproxy support, there is a branch, but it's not finished: https://github.com/greenhost/viper/tree/obfsproxy-support And then.. the serverside isn't pushed but it was working, it would generate scramblesuite passwords using so

Re: [tor-dev] Combining obfsproxy+scramblesuit with OpenVPN

2014-03-05 Thread Yawning Angel
On Wed, 05 Mar 2014 15:08:06 +0200 irregula...@riseup.net wrote: > Luckily yawning provided a patch some days ago [5], and I decided to > test it. According to patch's comments, it implements a Socks5 proxy > with authentication as in RFC 1928/RFC 1929. This authentication is > gonna serve as a mea

[tor-dev] Combining obfsproxy+scramblesuit with OpenVPN

2014-03-05 Thread irregulator
Hello people, I'm investigating how may we combine the traffic obfuscation provided by obfsproxy+scramblesuit with OpenVPN instead of Tor. I completely understand how this combination does not provide anonymity, but nevertheless I think it will be of some use. In the recent past there have been