Re: [tor-dev] Clarification of prop 186

2012-07-17 Thread Linus Nordberg
Nick Mathewson wrote Tue, 17 Jul 2012 09:31:48 -0400: | Everything that describes how these documents are formatted describes | them as containing multiple "a" lines. Thus, anybody parsing a | consensus or microdescriptor MUST accept multiple "a" lines, even if | they ignore all but the first. |

Re: [tor-dev] Clarification of prop 186

2012-07-17 Thread Nick Mathewson
On Tue, Jul 17, 2012 at 12:24 AM, Linus Nordberg wrote: > Hi, > > Can votes and consensuses have more than one "a" line? Prop 186 says, on > one hand > > [...] votes should include a single "a" line for every relay that has > an IPv6 address, to include the first IPv6 line in its > descripto

Re: [tor-dev] Clarification of prop 186

2012-07-17 Thread Jeroen Massar
On 2012-07-17 06:24, Linus Nordberg wrote: > Hi, > > Can votes and consensuses have more than one "a" line? Prop 186 says, on > one hand > > [...] votes should include a single "a" line for every relay that has > an IPv6 address, to include the first IPv6 line in its > descriptor. [...] The

[tor-dev] Clarification of prop 186

2012-07-16 Thread Linus Nordberg
Hi, Can votes and consensuses have more than one "a" line? Prop 186 says, on one hand [...] votes should include a single "a" line for every relay that has an IPv6 address, to include the first IPv6 line in its descriptor. [...] The remaining or-address lines will turn into "a" lines in t