Nicholas Hopper writes:
> On Tue, Apr 15, 2014 at 6:35 AM, George Kadianakis
> wrote:
>> A patch for the proposal would be useful. If you don't have time to do
>> it, just tell me and I will do it myself.
>
> Here's a patch:
> https://www-users.cs.umn.edu/~hopper/single-guard-node.patch
Just a
Nicholas Hopper writes:
> On Tue, Apr 15, 2014 at 6:35 AM, George Kadianakis
> wrote:
>> A patch for the proposal would be useful. If you don't have time to do
>> it, just tell me and I will do it myself.
>
> Here's a patch:
> https://www-users.cs.umn.edu/~hopper/single-guard-node.patch
Thanks
On Thu, Apr 17, 2014 at 2:05 PM, Nicholas Hopper wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 15, 2014 at 6:35 AM, George Kadianakis
> wrote:
>> A patch for the proposal would be useful. If you don't have time to do
>> it, just tell me and I will do it myself.
>
> Here's a patch:
> https://www-users.cs.umn.edu/~hopper/
On Tue, Apr 15, 2014 at 6:35 AM, George Kadianakis wrote:
> A patch for the proposal would be useful. If you don't have time to do
> it, just tell me and I will do it myself.
Here's a patch:
https://www-users.cs.umn.edu/~hopper/single-guard-node.patch
--
---
Nicholas Hopper writes:
> On Fri, Apr 11, 2014 at 7:45 AM, George Kadianakis
> wrote:
>> I see. That makes sense, I think.
>
> Good.
>
>> I will ponder on this a bit more, and then edit the proposal.
>
> When/if you become convinced, let me know if you want me to draft a patch.
>
I think it ma
On Fri, Apr 11, 2014 at 7:45 AM, George Kadianakis wrote:
> I see. That makes sense, I think.
Good.
> I will ponder on this a bit more, and then edit the proposal.
When/if you become convinced, let me know if you want me to draft a patch.
> (I would like to think a bit more about how accurate
> On Mon, Apr 7, 2014 at 11:34 AM, George Kadianakis > So, based on your
> response, IIUC, the idea is that because young
> > guards are underutilized, we want to increase the probability of them
> > being chosen in non-guard positions, so that they become more utilized
> > till more people pick th
On Mon, Apr 7, 2014 at 11:34 AM, George Kadianakis > So, based on your
response, IIUC, the idea is that because young
> guards are underutilized, we want to increase the probability of them
> being chosen in non-guard positions, so that they become more utilized
> till more people pick them as guar
Nicholas Hopper writes:
> I think I'll have more to say later, but...
>
> On Wed, Mar 26, 2014 at 11:36 AM, George Kadianakis
> wrote:
>> 1.3. Age of guard as a factor on guard probabilities
>>
>>By increasing the guard rotation period we also increase the lack
>>of clients for young gua
On Wed, Mar 26, 2014 at 11:57:08AM -0500, Nicholas Hopper wrote:
> >We can try to mitigate this phenomenon by giving higher priority to
> >young guards to be picked as guards:
>
> I'm pretty sure this section has it backwards from what was the intent
> of the discussion of "guard age" at t
I think I'll have more to say later, but...
On Wed, Mar 26, 2014 at 11:36 AM, George Kadianakis
wrote:
> 1.3. Age of guard as a factor on guard probabilities
>
>By increasing the guard rotation period we also increase the lack
>of clients for young guards since clients will rotate guards
I promised Nick I would have something for him by today's little-t-tor
meeting.
Here is a draft of the guard node security proposal.
Definitely needs more work:
Filename: xxx-single-guard-node.txt
Title: The move to a single guard node
Author: George Kadianakis
Created: 2014-03-22
Status: Draft a
12 matches
Mail list logo
