On Wed, Oct 30, 2013 at 08:11:16AM +, Matthew Finkel wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 28, 2013 at 08:49:46PM +, George Kadianakis wrote:
...
> > It seems to me that an IP+Client adversary is always able to find the
> > number and status of HS-nodes. The proposed ways to fix this is to add
> > measures
On Mon, Oct 28, 2013 at 08:49:46PM +, George Kadianakis wrote:
> Christopher Baines writes:
>
> > On 28/10/13 13:19, Matthew Finkel wrote:
> >> This is a proposal I wrote to implement scalable hidden services. It's
> >> by no means finished (there are some slight inconsistencies which I will
On Mon, Oct 28, 2013 at 07:40:12PM +, Christopher Baines wrote:
> On 28/10/13 13:19, Matthew Finkel wrote:
> > This is a proposal I wrote to implement scalable hidden services. It's
> > by no means finished (there are some slight inconsistencies which I will
> > be correcting later today or tom
On Mon, Oct 28, 2013 at 12:53:35PM -0400, Nick Mathewson wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 28, 2013 at 9:19 AM, Matthew Finkel
> wrote:
> > Hi everyone,
> >
> > This is a proposal I wrote to implement scalable hidden services. It's
> > by no means finished (there are some slight inconsistencies which I will
>
Christopher Baines writes:
> On 28/10/13 13:19, Matthew Finkel wrote:
>> This is a proposal I wrote to implement scalable hidden services. It's
>> by no means finished (there are some slight inconsistencies which I will
>> be correcting later today or tomorrow) but I want to make it public in
>>
On 28/10/13 13:19, Matthew Finkel wrote:
> This is a proposal I wrote to implement scalable hidden services. It's
> by no means finished (there are some slight inconsistencies which I will
> be correcting later today or tomorrow) but I want to make it public in
> the meantime. I'm also working on s
Hi,
you good people do still have a VM on its own ipV4 sat twiddling its
thumbs. It is pencilled in to be a 2nd relay for beta testing on. If you'd
like to put it to a different use, please feel more than free to ask.
Regards,
Phill.
On 28 October 2013 16:53, Nick Mathewson wrote:
> On Mon,
On Mon, Oct 28, 2013 at 9:19 AM, Matthew Finkel
wrote:
> Hi everyone,
>
> This is a proposal I wrote to implement scalable hidden services. It's
> by no means finished (there are some slight inconsistencies which I will
> be correcting later today or tomorrow) but I want to make it public in
> the
Hi everyone,
This is a proposal I wrote to implement scalable hidden services. It's
by no means finished (there are some slight inconsistencies which I will
be correcting later today or tomorrow) but I want to make it public in
the meantime. I'm also working on some additional security measures th
