-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
>> I'll prepare a unit file for this and add it to the trac entry.
a first version is there
https://bugs.torproject.org/14995
>> Weasel wrote:
>>> Tor trac is not the place to discuss Debian packaging
>>> enhancements
>
> Right. In the specific c
Nusenu wrote (17 Mar 2015 12:15:22 GMT) :
> intrigeri:
>> Just for the record, we've discussed this a few months ago with
> Is there a trac entry?
I don't think so.
> I'll prepare a unit file for this and add it to the trac entry.
\o/
> Weasel wrote:
>> Tor trac is not the place to discuss Debi
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
intrigeri:
> Nusenu wrote (16 Mar 2015 14:09:13 GMT) :
>> many relay operators run multiple tor instances to overcome
>> certain limitations. Currently the official deb packages do not
>> come with an easy configurable way to run multiple tor
>> inst
Hi,
Nusenu wrote (16 Mar 2015 14:09:13 GMT) :
> many relay operators run multiple tor instances to overcome certain
> limitations. Currently the official deb packages do not come with an
> easy configurable way to run multiple tor instances.
Just for the record, we've discussed this a few months
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Hi Weasel,
many relay operators run multiple tor instances to overcome certain
limitations. Currently the official deb packages do not come with an
easy configurable way to run multiple tor instances.
I created a ticket [1] and wrote a patch [2] to
