Re: [tor-dev] Freenet + Onioncat: Is the traffic welcome?

2016-06-24 Thread konstant
project.org/pipermail/devl/2016-June/039056.html >> https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/devl/2016-June/039059.html >> > > Hello konstant, > > this is an interesting approach! Thanks for putting time on this :) > > I find the security properties of high latency anon

Re: [tor-dev] Freenet + Onioncat: Is the traffic welcome?

2016-06-23 Thread konstant
[konstant] arma: Do you give this a thumbs up? https://lists.torproject.org/pipermail/tor-dev/2016-June/011108.html [arma] not necessarily? how much traffic is it? [arma] "just add more traffic" mostly hurts tor, alas [arma] since it doesn't really improve security, and it slows it

Re: [tor-dev] Freenet + Onioncat: Is the traffic welcome?

2016-06-22 Thread konstant
> On 6/22/16, konst...@mail2tor.com wrote: >> I posted steps on how to connect Freenet nodes over Onioncat and >> Garlicat >> for Tor/I2P. I am looking to scale it into an Opennet inside Tor with a >> lot of peers: >> >> https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/devl/2016-June/039056.html >> https:

[tor-dev] Freenet + Onioncat: Is the traffic welcome?

2016-06-22 Thread konstant
I posted steps on how to connect Freenet nodes over Onioncat and Garlicat for Tor/I2P. I am looking to scale it into an Opennet inside Tor with a lot of peers: https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/devl/2016-June/039056.html https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/devl/2016-June/039059.html I