Re: [tor-dev] Onioncat and Prop224

2016-10-05 Thread Tim Kuijsten
Op 05-10-16 om 19:36 schreef Evan d'Entremont: to be more clear, those devices can currently be surveilled passively. If they were encrypted they couldn't be. ic, valid point. I was thinking more of the recent rise in exploited IoT devices[1] and the sad state of IoT security in general. [1]

Re: [tor-dev] Onioncat and Prop224

2016-10-04 Thread Tim Kuijsten
Op 04-10-16 om 16:59 schreef Tim Kuijsten: Op 03-10-16 om 19:43 schreef Evan d'Entremont: Not if IoT dev's start encrypting things. How would encryption help against exploited IoT devices? sorry, i meant to ask how would encryption help against *exploiting* Io

Re: [tor-dev] Onioncat and Prop224

2016-10-04 Thread Tim Kuijsten
Op 03-10-16 om 19:43 schreef Evan d'Entremont: Not if IoT dev's start encrypting things. How would encryption help against exploited IoT devices? ___ tor-dev mailing list tor-dev@lists.torproject.org https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listin

Re: [tor-dev] Tor not affected by recent openssl security advisories

2016-01-28 Thread Tim Kuijsten
It's also worth noting that newer (0.2.7.x) versions of Tor should not be doing DHE except when talking to old versions of Tor, linked against old versions of OpenSSL as ECDH is both mandatory and preferred in the current stable series. Is ECDH currently mandatory or did you mean ECDHE?