On Thu, Apr 07, 2011 at 06:13:45PM -0400, Nick Mathewson wrote:
> Oh! Also, for a bit of redundancy, I'm thinking that the symmetric
> crypto parts of the improved onion handshakes ought to be with a less
> malleable mode of operation than the counter-mode stuff we do now.
> Perhaps we could make
On Thu, Apr 07, 2011 at 05:10:05PM -0400, Nick Mathewson wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 7, 2011 at 3:48 PM, Gisle Vanem wrote:
> > - "c:\\windows\\temp\\tor_test_%d", (int)getpid());
> > + "%s\\tor_test_%d", getenv("TEMP"), (int)getpid());
>
> What guarantees that TEMP will alwa
