Re: [tor-dev] Draft of proposal "Direct Onion Services: Fast-but-not-hidden services"

2015-04-20 Thread Speak Freely
guity to the hidden onion services. Just to throw a wrench into the mix... - (OS) Obfuscated Service to replace Hidden (Onion) Service - (DS) Direct Service to represent the new type of Onion Service - (TS) Any [Must-]Tor Service Those... seem to me to be clear and to the poin

Re: [tor-dev] Draft of proposal "Direct Onion Services: Fast-but-not-hidden services"

2015-04-20 Thread Speak Freely
direct connection to the [Service], and there is no implied improvements beyond the statement that it's direct. Then there's also "Direct Public (Onion) Service", which would be DPS or DPOS... Matt Speak Freely ___ tor-dev mailing list tor-dev@lists.torproject.org https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-dev

Re: [tor-dev] Renaming arm

2015-03-16 Thread Speak Freely
" <-- damn you Cisco. That's awesome. But I do see your point. You don't want the package to be one of many systems. Wait a minute... Hey, thanks for writing arm! Whatever you name it, I'll use it. Kind regards, Matt Speak Freely _

Re: [tor-dev] Renaming arm

2015-03-16 Thread Speak Freely
ust throwing it out there. Kind regards, Matt Speak Freely ___ tor-dev mailing list tor-dev@lists.torproject.org https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-dev

Re: [tor-dev] Performance and Security Improvements for Tor: A Survey

2015-03-16 Thread Speak Freely
27;s already published there is no point in commenting about them now. For the all the devs, if you'd like me to proof-read anything, send it my way and I'll have a go at it. I'm a bit of a stickler when it comes to documentation, and read them for fun so, if you do