[tor-dev] sigstore for improving verification of downloads?

2021-04-19 Thread axel simon
l! axel 1. Jointly with Google and Purdue University, https://sigstore.dev 2. https://certificate.transparency.dev/ 3. https://github.com/sigstore 4. https://join.slack.com/t/sigstore/shared_invite/zt-mhs55zh0-XmY3bcfWn4XEyMqUUutbUQ -- axel simon a...@redhat.com // axel+...@axelsimon.net __

[tor-dev] proposal: new log severity level: trace

2018-05-31 Thread Simon
bler files change the assembler call function into an indirect call function which uses the newly created indirect function pointer. In theory the makefile just works and is unmodified. However, extra files get created during make. Looking forward to comments, suggestions, and/or v

Re: [tor-dev] [Proposal] A simple way to make Tor-Browser-Bundle more portable and secure

2016-10-29 Thread Daniel Simon
Anyone got further into this? It would be a joint-project between musl and tor organizations. Maybe for GSoC 2017 if nobody works on it until then? On Mon, May 9, 2016 at 11:15 AM, Daniel Simon wrote: > Hello. > > How it's currently done - The Tor Browser Bundle is dynamically li

[tor-dev] [Proposal] A simple way to make Tor-Browser-Bundle more portable and secure

2016-05-09 Thread Daniel Simon
Hello. How it's currently done - The Tor Browser Bundle is dynamically linked against glibc. Security problem - The Tor Browser Bundle has the risk of information about the host system's library ecosystem leaking out onto the network. Portability problem - The Tor Browser Bundle can't be run on

[tor-dev] Tor Browser Bundle on musl libc systems

2016-04-25 Thread Daniel Simon
ty - Linux distributions that use musl libc could figure out how to compile the Tor Browser Bundle from source and provide binaries themselves What does everyone think about these possible solutions? Which one is the best? Are there any others you can think about? Thanks for everyone's

[tor-dev] Using Traceroute for AS-Path prediction

2015-02-26 Thread Simon Koch
Looking Glass servers and public BGP-peers is very small. Any idea on how to establish diverse measurementpoints (maybe volunteers) would be greatly appreciated. Regards, Simon ___ tor-dev mailing list tor-dev@lists.torproject.org https

Re: [tor-dev] Testing in Tor [was Re: Brainstorming a Tor censorship analysis tool]

2012-12-22 Thread Simon
On Thu, Dec 20, 2012 at 11:25 AM, Nick Mathewson wrote: > On Wed, Dec 19, 2012 at 8:57 PM, Simon wrote: >> On Wed, Dec 19, 2012 at 4:35 PM, Nick Mathewson wrote: >>> What's your favorite C mocking solution for integrating with existing >>> codebases without much

Re: [tor-dev] Testing in Tor

2012-12-22 Thread Simon
listen on port zero and/or report the port that it actually ends up listening on. So what's the difference between Stem tests and 'Chutney'? AFAIK Chutney is a bunch of WIP Python scripts to setup and execute end-to-end Tor tests. Are t

Re: [tor-dev] Testing in Tor

2012-12-20 Thread Simon
omehow run in parallel to speed things up? I noticed a few time.sleep() calls in the .py files :-( -- Simon ___ tor-dev mailing list tor-dev@lists.torproject.org https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-dev

Re: [tor-dev] Testing in Tor [was Re: Brainstorming a Tor censorship analysis tool]

2012-12-20 Thread Simon
tory. It looks like the data directory was created as expected: $ find test/data/ test/data/ test/data/log test/data/torrc Unfortunately ./run_tests.py --help isn't telling me about e.g. a verbosity level option to help give more of a clue as to what is going wrong :-( Any more ideas?

Re: [tor-dev] Testing in Tor [was Re: Brainstorming a Tor censorship analysis tool]

2012-12-20 Thread Simon
Performing startup activities... checking for orphaned .pyc files... done == INTEGRATION TESTS == Setting up a test instance... m

Re: [tor-dev] Testing in Tor [was Re: Brainstorming a Tor censorship analysis tool]

2012-12-20 Thread Simon
> Help expanding the tests even further would be greatly appreciated. -Damian So I have a built and make tested tor-0.2.3.25/ folder and stem/ in a parallel folder. When I run the command then I get the following: $ ./run_tests.py --integ Unable to start tor, 'tor' d

Re: [tor-dev] Testing in Tor [was Re: Brainstorming a Tor censorship analysis tool]

2012-12-19 Thread Simon
On Wed, Dec 19, 2012 at 4:35 PM, Nick Mathewson wrote: > On Wed, Dec 19, 2012 at 5:45 PM, Simon wrote: >> On Wed, Dec 19, 2012 at 1:49 PM, Nick Mathewson wrote: >>> On Wed, Dec 19, 2012 at 2:29 PM, Simon wrote: > [...] >>> * Large parts of the codebase have bee

Re: [tor-dev] Testing in Tor [was Re: Brainstorming a Tor censorship analysis tool]

2012-12-19 Thread Simon
On Wed, Dec 19, 2012 at 1:49 PM, Nick Mathewson wrote: > On Wed, Dec 19, 2012 at 2:29 PM, Simon wrote: > [...] >> Tor seems to have good planning compared to most open source projects. >> So I would be interested in hearing why testing is apparently 'falling >> b

Re: [tor-dev] Brainstorming a Tor censorship analysis tool

2012-12-19 Thread Simon
On Wed, Dec 19, 2012 at 5:20 AM, George Kadianakis wrote: > Philipp Winter writes: > >> Hi there, >> >> Deliverable 6 for sponsor Z says: >> >>> 6. Start a tool that a censored developer can run to discover why their Tor >>> is >>> failing to connect: brainstorm a list of "things to check", and

[tor-dev] questions about parallel Tor circuits en masse & adoption drivers

2012-11-27 Thread Simon
a new functional focal point; i.e. not anonymity -- politically desirable for the Tor project? Thanks, Simon Experienced network programming enthusiast from Vancouver, Canada ___ tor-dev mailing list tor-dev@lists.torproject.org https://lists.torproject.or