Hi Tor-Dev,
I'm sending this message on behalf of Hammas, one of my PhD students at
UIowa, who has been unable to get his emails past moderator approval.
Hammas and I have been recently working on the implications of visiting the
Tor hidden services through services not endorsed by Tor itself. The
Forgive the lack of inlining.
I've been meaning to respond to this for a while. For what it's worth, I
completely disagree that outright "banning" of certain data collection is
the right answer here. There should be a standard "let's weigh the risks
vs. the benefits and make a decision" for any/al
2015 at 08:24:49AM -0400, Rishab Nithyanand wrote:
> > Hey all,
> >
> > I just thought I'd share and get feedback about some recent work from
> our team
> > at Stony Brook University. I posted this to the tor-talk list earlier
> and it
> > was suggested to x-
Agreed! In fact, our team at Stony Brook just completed a study on the
huggability of current PTs. One of our results is that the Scramblesuit
bumblebee fared worst. It caused some of our study participants to report
us to the IRB. We in turn chose to blame David for encouraging this study.
Next,
Hey all,
I was wondering if anyone could help me figure out the status of this blog
post (from August 2014):
https://blog.torproject.org/blog/call-arms-helping-internet-services-accept-anonymous-users
Specifically this part: "Step one is to enumerate the set of websites and
other Internet service
Hey all,
I just thought I'd share and get feedback about some recent work from our
team at Stony Brook University. I posted this to the tor-talk list earlier
and it was suggested to x-post here, too.
Title: Games Without Frontiers: Investigating Video Games as a Covert
Channel [ http://arxiv.org/
