Hi nusenu (and tor-dev@),
On 2021-09-17 16:02, nusenu wrote:
it would be great if you could open a MR for the proposal so we can
always see the latest version and changes
there.
(Over time it became unclear what comments have already been addressed
in the text an which didn't.)
Done: https://g
Hi David,
On 2021-09-14 12:00, David Goulet wrote:
On 14 Sep (11:31:02), Neel Chauhan wrote:
3. Implementation details
The MiddleOnly flag can be assigned to relays whose IP addresses are
configured at the directory authority level, similar to how the
BadExit flag
currently works. In
Hi Roger,
On 2021-09-12 20:48, Roger Dingledine wrote:
On Sun, Sep 12, 2021 at 12:17:37PM -0700, Neel Chauhan wrote:
If a relay has the MiddleOnly flag, we do not allow it to be used for
the
following purposes:
* Entry Guard
While we're trying to be exhaustive here, "Direc
Hi nusenu,
On 2021-09-12 14:47, nusenu wrote:
thanks for these pointers.
In case "ExcludeGuardNodes" option is accepted and merged, the
documentation should explicitly point out
the differences between
LimitToMiddleOnlyNodes NodeX
vs.
ExcludeGuardNodes NodeX
+
ExcludeExitNodes NodeX
thanks,
n
Hi,
On 2021-09-12 12:31, nusenu wrote:
Neel Chauhan:
Also ensure this functionality is available to tor clients via a
torrc option like "ExcludeExitNodes" can be used by tor clients as
well.
The torrc option for clients could be named
"LimitToMiddleOnlyNodes" or similar
Hi nusenu,
On 2021-09-10 16:05, nusenu wrote:
Thank you for working on this,
I was hoping for such a flag for a long time,
great to see that it is happening now.
No problem!
The flag should minimize the ability of the relay to do harm.
This means such relays should _not_ be used by tor clien
#x27;s GPON splitter node. And no, I'm not signing up for
Comcast since Tor+WFH would saturate the DOCSIS upstream assuming I
won't go over the cap (which I will).Filename: 334-middle-only-flag.txt
Title: A dirauth flag to mark Relays as Middle-only
Author: Neel Chauhan
Created: 2021
date also completes the missing paragraph reported by
Ian, that seemed to miss me in the original proposal.
-Neel ChauhanFilename: 334-middle-only-flag.txt
Title: A dirauth flag to mark Relays as Middle-only
Author: Neel Chauhan
Created: 2021-09-07
Status: Open
1. Introduction
The Health Team
Hi,
As asked in the torspec MR [1] (42) for ticket [2] (40448), I propose a
MiddleOnly dirauth flag for relays.
The proposal, #334, is attached to this email, and is titled "A dirauth
flag to mark Relays as Middle-only".
Please comment and review it.
Best,
Neel Chauhan
===
however).
Is there any other reason?
Best,
Neel Chauhan
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
___
tor-dev mailing list
tor-dev@lists.torproject.org
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-dev
Hi tor-dev@,
Ticket: https://trac.torproject.org/projects/tor/ticket/32905
GitHub PR: https://github.com/torproject/tor/pull/1652
Considering that people had issues with the ClientAutoIPv6ORPort option,
like when IPv6 was tried on IPv4-only connections in [1] and [2], I
think we should just re
the relay monitoring section.
FYI the PR is here: https://github.com/torproject/torspec/pull/98
However, I'm worried I removed something you may feel is necessary.
-Neel
On 2019-12-16 19:09, teor wrote:
Hi Neel,
On 17 Dec 2019, at 09:37, Neel Chauhan wrote:
Hi tor-dev@ mailing list,
Hi tor-dev@ mailing list,
Sorry for the many-months delay in updating Prop306.
I have updated Prop306, which is the IPv6 Happy Eyeballs proposal.
The GitHub PR is here: https://github.com/torproject/torspec/pull/98
The Trac ticket is here:
https://trac.torproject.org/projects/tor/ticket/29801
Just a reminder that this proposal (Prop306) needs to be reviewed:
https://github.com/torproject/torspec/pull/87
-Neel
===
https://www.neelc.org/
On 2019-07-21 10:30, n...@neelc.org wrote:
Hi,
I have split up the sections. The GitHub PR is here:
https://github.com/torproject/torspec/pull/8
On 2019-07-25 12:35, Nick Mathewson wrote:
Please use 307 for this; I think 306 is in use.
That's me, the Prop306 guy!
The title should be: "Proposal 307: Onion Balance Support for Onion
Service v3" (Note the 307)
-Neel
___
tor-dev mailing list
to
Hi teor,
Thanks, I opened a ticket to review and merge it here:
https://trac.torproject.org/projects/tor/ticket/29687
It should get reviewed within a week or two.
First off, thank you for doing this! As of now, it seems to have been
merged.
I have added the "TrackFailures" flag to my GitH
Hi teor,
On 2019-03-05 21:12, teor wrote:
Sure. We usually do torspec changes using GitHub pull requests.
Can you open a pull request on https://github.com/torproject/torspec ?
Then link to the pull request from #27491 or in an email reply.
The GitHub PR is here: https://github.com/torproject/
he updated (and
attached) proposal?
Also, if any of you have opinions on this proposal, please share them
with me.
-Neel
===
https://www.neelc.org/Filename: 299-ip-failure-count.txt
Title: Preferring IPv4 or IPv6 based on IP Version Failure Count
Author: Neel Chauhan
Created: 25-Jan-2019
St
eeded?
Thank You,
Neel
===
https://www.neelc.org/
February 5, 2019 11:40 PM, "teor" wrote:
> Hi Neel,
>
> Thanks for your initial draft code, and this proposal.
>
> On February 6, 2019 12:26:40 AM UTC, Neel Chauhan wrote:
>
>> Hi tor-dev@ mailing list,
/torspec.git/tree/proposals/299-ip-failure-count.txt
Now that my proposal "Preferring IPv4 or IPv6 based on IP Version Failure
Count" is Open, I would really appreciate your opinions on this. Is it good,
bad? Could it have any improvements?
Best,
Neel Chauhan
===
https://www
Hi Nick,
Thank you so much!
Sorry if my proposal says "Draft". I believe my proposal is complete. Would it
be possible to mark Prop299 as "Open"?
Best,
Neel
===
https://www.neelc.org/
January 28, 2019 5:32 AM, "Nick Mathewson" wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 25, 201
, 2019 12:31 AM, "teor" wrote:
> On January 25, 2019 9:53:51 PM UTC, Neel Chauhan wrote:
>
>> Hi tor-dev@ mailing list,
>>
>> I have been working on Bug #27491
>> (https://trac.torproject.org/projects/tor/ticket/27491) and have been
>> asked to wri
problems with it?).
Thank You,
Neel Chahan
Filename: xxx-ip-failure-count.txt
Title: Preferring IPv4 or IPv6 based on IP Version Failure Count
Author: Neel Chauhan
Created: 25-Jan-2019
Status: Draft
Ticket: https://trac.torproject.org/projects/tor/ticket/27491
1. Introduction
As IPv4 address
but I would really appreciate a reviewer.
Thank You,
Neel Chauhan
===
https://www.neelc.org/
___
tor-dev mailing list
tor-dev@lists.torproject.org
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-dev
code ready for #27491 and #27492 but am awaiting the merger of #27490 before I
submit them?
I am also currently working on Bug #27647.
Thank You,
Neel Chauhan
___
tor-dev mailing list
tor-dev@lists.torproject.org
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin
25 matches
Mail list logo
