tordev...@safe-mail.net wrote:
> > > I'm not talking about those providers hosting exit nodes. I'm
> > > talking about general web sites and resources hosted by them and
> > > the traffic that goes there.
> >
> > I'm confused. You're worried about people hosting clearnet websites
> > with cloud hos
tordev...@safe-mail.net wrote:
> > I don't think banning GCE, AWS and MS Azure is an efficient method
> > to significantly increase the cost of attacks because it is trivial
> > for an attacker to quickly spin up "a large number of disposable
> > machines" at other ISPs as well.
>
> It has other b
Mansour Moufid wrote:
> Michael McConville wrote:
> > free() is specified to be NULL-safe, and I don't know of any
> > implementations that violate this.
>
> I think those NULL checks are meant to avoid double-free bugs. If you
> assign NULL to a pointer after you f
free() is specified to be NULL-safe, and I don't know of any
implementations that violate this. Tor's *_free() functions conform,
although relaycache_free() prints a warning (which I remove in the below
diff).
I checked every *_free() function for NULL-safety before removing
conditions for it. Thi
