Re: [tor-dev] How to build a Router that will only allow Tor users

Am 2016-03-15 um 19:07 schrieb Rusty Bird: > Hi Martin, > >> I try to configure OpenWRT in a way that it will only allow outgoing >> connections if it is Tor. Basically it is the opposite of "blacklisting >> exit relays on servers": "whitelisting (guard) relays for clients". It >> should *not* run

Re: [tor-dev] How to build a Router that will only allow Tor users

Am 2016-03-15 um 18:10 schrieb Tom Ritter: > On 15 March 2016 at 10:52, Martin Kepplinger wrote: >> Hi, >> >> I try to configure OpenWRT in a way that it will only allow outgoing >> connections if it is Tor. Basically it is the opposite of "blacklisting >>

Re: [tor-dev] How to build a Router that will only allow Tor users

Am 2016-03-15 um 16:52 schrieb Martin Kepplinger: > Hi, > > I try to configure OpenWRT in a way that it will only allow outgoing > connections if it is Tor. Basically it is the opposite of "blacklisting > exit relays on servers": "whitelisting (guard) relays for c

[tor-dev] How to build a Router that will only allow Tor users

Hi, I try to configure OpenWRT in a way that it will only allow outgoing connections if it is Tor. Basically it is the opposite of "blacklisting exit relays on servers": "whitelisting (guard) relays for clients". It should *not* run Tor itself. A first test setup (onionoo document, ipset and ipta

Re: [tor-dev] [PATCH] entrynodes.c: Improve readability (issue 9971)

Am 2014-06-28 23:57, schrieb Martin Kepplinger: > Maybe we can do away with issue 9971 and improve readability: > https://trac.torproject.org/projects/tor/ticket/9971 > any advice or objections? I waited a week or so and why not ask. no pressure. maybe someone has time to look into it.

Re: [tor-dev] [PATCH] remove test for remote SOCKS Port at config validation

Am 2014-06-28 15:00, schrieb Martin Kepplinger: > (why doesn't git send-email work for this list?) > > this is UNTESTED and for now, more of a question if this may suffice to > close ticket 4019: > Any advice or objections on this? I just waited a week or so and asking d

Re: [tor-dev] I have a group at internet archive that are interested in buying a lot of OnionPi's

Am 2014-06-29 08:57, schrieb Roger Dingledine: > On Sat, Jun 28, 2014 at 10:11:24PM +0200, Moritz Bartl wrote: >> On 06/27/2014 09:44 PM, Virgil Griffith wrote: >>> What is the current state of the art on this, and if it is ready for >>> larger deployment want to buy about 50-100 of them. >> >> In

[tor-dev] 1 Re: [PATCH] entrynodes.c: Improve readability (issue 9971)

Am 2014-06-28 23:57, schrieb Martin Kepplinger: > Maybe we can do away with issue 9971 and improve readability: > https://trac.torproject.org/projects/tor/ticket/9971 > >From 8de701e860d2e68d6b05767824efdf6e91de77fa Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Martin Kepplinger Date: Sat, 28 Ju

[tor-dev] 2 Re: [PATCH] entrynodes.c: Improve readability (issue 9971)

Am 2014-06-28 23:57, schrieb Martin Kepplinger: > Maybe we can do away with issue 9971 and improve readability: > https://trac.torproject.org/projects/tor/ticket/9971 > >From ec585a3b10f039589ad2b3a4f42f6a4fdae97415 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Martin Kepplinger Date: Sat, 28 Ju

[tor-dev] 3 Re: [PATCH] entrynodes.c: Improve readability (issue 9971)

Am 2014-06-28 23:57, schrieb Martin Kepplinger: > Maybe we can do away with issue 9971 and improve readability: > https://trac.torproject.org/projects/tor/ticket/9971 > NEEDS REVIEW. >From 9e7f10abc9012e6820102b96c30c54a7d8ab8600 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Martin Kepplinger D

[tor-dev] [PATCH] entrynodes.c: Improve readability (issue 9971)

Maybe we can do away with issue 9971 and improve readability: https://trac.torproject.org/projects/tor/ticket/9971 As response to this mail, I'll append seperate patches for the 3 sub-issues mentioned. They apply (and are build-tested) seperately to the current tree, so a maintainer can quickly pi

[tor-dev] [PATCH] remove test for remote SOCKS Port at config validation

(why doesn't git send-email work for this list?) this is UNTESTED and for now, more of a question if this may suffice to close ticket 4019: -- Martin Kepplinger http://martinkepplinger.com >From 8fe174008e162bff7eb5a15e5f34cc6731e852dd Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Martin Kepplinger D

[tor-dev] [PATCH] remove test for remote SOCKS Port at config validation

remove the check for a non-local SOCKS Port in the config by removing the flag when calling parse_port_config() for it. this should only prevent parse_port_config() from writing a warning that is written when the listener is opened anyways, according to https://trac.torproject.org/projects/tor/tic

Re: [tor-dev] Proposal for improving social incentives for relay operators

Am 2014-06-10 02:26, schrieb Virgil Griffith: > For a while I've been seeking to grow the Tor network in both size and > goodput. Towards this end, I've explored various avenues such as > increasing user-awareness via tor2web. More recently, I've been > exploring financial incentives like TorCoin

Re: [tor-dev] Reminder: tor development meetings this (and every) Wednesday, 19:00 UTC

Am 2014-06-04 03:47, schrieb Nick Mathewson: > On Tue, Jun 3, 2014 at 9:27 PM, Nick Mathewson wrote: >> Hi, all! >> >> Here's your regular reminder for the weekly IRC meeting for people >> working on the program "tor". (This won't cover all the other >> programs developed under the Tor umbrella.)

[tor-dev] [PATCH] torspec: fix typos

>From 0bf2a1e00049e46413ef9eb7ed054090305cdafc Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Martin Kepplinger Date: Tue, 13 May 2014 19:47:43 +0200 Subject: [PATCH] Fix minor typos in tor-spec.txt --- I don't know if you take typo fixes. Please ignore if not but why not report them while reading

[tor-dev] [PATCH] Fix minor typos in tor-spec.txt

--- feel free to ignore this. I don't know if you take typo fixes. But why not report them while reading. thanks, martin tor-spec.txt | 10 +- 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) diff --git a/tor-spec.txt b/tor-spec.txt index 2555af4..86ee849 100644 ---