Sent from my iPhone b
___
tor-dev mailing list
tor-dev@lists.torproject.org
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-dev
These are the PDF versions of the Marionette Documents for easier reading.
The markdown versions of them can be found on the github distribution at
https://github.com/redjack/marionette/doc
--
John Helmsen
john.helm...@redjack.com
C: (301) 273-4372
FYI
The Marionette documentation.
Marionette Manuals for review
-- Forwarded message --
From: John Helmsen
Date: Fri, Aug 31, 2018 at 9:34 AM
Subject: Manuals
To: "Ianculovici, Ciprian"
--
John Helmsen
john.helm...@redjack.com
C: (301) 273-4372
--
Jo
te it into your code that calls it. Just let us know that you have
integrated it, so we can add you to our list of people that we have
integrated with.
--
John Helmsen
john.helm...@redjack.com
C: (240) 899-5676
___
tor-dev mailing list
tor-dev@lists.
eleases of STIX are available
only through GitHub and any new issues should be reported on the new site.
On Tue, Jul 24, 2018 at 2:09 PM, David Fifield
wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 24, 2018 at 01:57:36PM -0400, John Helmsen wrote:
> > Okay, I have generated a VM using VirtualBox of Ubuntu vers
out -b
tbb-8.0a9-build3'?) Otherwise, it complains about being headless.
On Tue, Jul 24, 2018 at 12:46 PM, David Fifield
wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 24, 2018 at 11:42:08AM -0400, John Helmsen wrote:
> > Thank you, I have created the ticket as #26920. https://trac.
> torproject.org/
> >
ing to create a virtual machine using Ubuntu 16.04 for
development. Unless I am mistaken, this work cannot be done on a Mac.
Please do the same, so that we can put this thing to bed.
On Mon, Jul 23, 2018 at 10:05 PM, David Fifield
wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 20, 2018 at 04:12:21PM -0400, John Helmsen wr
gning your own
protocols. This is in process.
Please let us know what you need.
John Helmsen
___
tor-dev mailing list
tor-dev@lists.torproject.org
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-dev
Hello Tor developers,
I am interested in becoming an open source contributor for Tor, but I don't
know where to start some guidance would be appreciated.
Thank you,
On Sat, Aug 12, 2017 at 8:00 AM,
wrote:
> Send tor-dev mailing list submissions to
> tor-dev@lists.torproject.org
>
> To
ciliate your statement that the server can choose its public material in
> a way to bias the entropy extractor. Or is this simply the same problem viewed
> from a different angle?
RFC5869 Section 3.3 is about skipping the call to HKDF-Extract... we
don't do that. See [2] section
All of these values are authentic from the client's perspective.
Since we're not including the server shares in the salt, we also
had to switch from sending 'auth' to sending HMAC(auth, transcript)
in the server response.
Cheers,
John
___
(Thread forked from [tor-dev] Notes from the prop224 proposal reading group)
> On Mar 17, 2016, at 7:29 PM, George Kadianakis wrote:
>
> Also, please see my torspec branch `prop224-fixes` for some torspec changes
> on prop224.
> My branch is sitting on top of the prop224 branch of special/dgoul
> On Mar 28, 2016, at 9:44 PM, David Goulet wrote:
>
> On 24 Mar (16:55:57), George Kadianakis wrote:
>>
>>
>> First of all, the UPDATE-KEYS-SUBCMD mechanism does not actually prevent
>> replay
>> attacks at all. It's a performance feature. It's there so that if the HS
>> rotates its replay c
> On Jan 16, 2016, at 4:52 AM, George Kadianakis wrote:
>
> Yes, I think I agree with this evaluation for now. Seems prop246 is more
> complicated than we can handle, and we should probably postpone it, except if
> someone can analyze it well soon.
I agree. There are too many open questions wit
Hi David,
Thank you, these pointers were very helpful. Do you know if there is
some kind of resource that lists known censorship events? I'd like to
see how good the approach from the paper does at identifying them.
--john
David Fifield:
> On Tue, Jan 12, 2016 at 07:21:39AM +0000, Jo
the time series of the number
of requests to directory servers from certain jurisdictions. Where can I
find this data about the requests to directory servers?
--john
[1] https://research.torproject.org/techreports/detector-2011-09-09.pdf
___
tor-dev
tordev...@safe-mail.net wrote:
>> The final circuit looks like:
>>
>> Client -> Guard -> Middle -> Middle -> Single Onion
>>
>> The client’s traffic is encrypted through to the single onion server as
>> well.
>
> IMO, the second Middle relay can be considered serving as an exit with
> regards t
Yawning Angel wrote:
> I have two objections to this, one political, one technical:
>
> * (The political objection) While this is "cool" and probably(?)
> "funded", it seems like a poor thing to work on in terms of
> developmental priority when there are other things Hidden Service
> relat
tordev...@safe-mail.net wrote:
> Doesn't your proposal imply that you are turning all relays into
> exit-nodes lite? The last relay in the path will know what service you are
> connecting to (at least if that service is hosted with a unique relay),
> right?
A single onion service operates its own
-
Filename: xxx-single-onion.txt
Title: Single Onion Services
Author: John Brooks, Paul Syverson, Roger Dingledine
Created: 2015-07-13
Status: Draft
1. Overview
Single onion services are a modified form of onion services, which
trade
service-side location privacy for improved performance
I think you are confusing the median with the mean:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Median
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mean
Taking the median instead of the mean can be beneficial in situations
where you have larger outliers in your data, which typically affect the
mean very much.
-j
Virgil Gri
l-funded
relays. Concentrating even more traffic and information onto the
highest-bandwidth relays isn’t an improvement.
- John
>
>
> Aaron
>
> ___
> tor-dev mailing list
> tor-dev@lists.torproject.org
> https://lists.torproject.org/cg
Nicholas Hopper wrote:
> On Sun, Jul 12, 2015 at 4:48 PM, John Brooks
> wrote:
>> Comments are encouraged, especially if there are downsides or side
>> effects
>> that we haven’t written about yet, or that you have a different opinion
>> on.
>> The intent is
teor wrote:
>
>> On 13 Jul 2015, at 07:48 , John Brooks
>> wrote:
>
>> 4.2. Restriction on the number of intro points and impact on load
>> balancing
>>
>> One drawback of this proposal is that the number of introduction points
>> o
/torspec/224-no-hsdir/proposals/ideas/xxx-merge-hsdir-and-intro.txt
Thanks!
- John
Filename: xxx-merge-hsdir-and-intro.txt
Title: Merging Hidden Service Directories and Introduction Points
Author: John Brooks, George Kadianakis
Created: 2015-07-12
1. Overview and Motivation
This document
will be to modify 224 to describe this approach, and see what
problems that exercise turns up. Unless something comes up, I think this is
worth serious debate as a replacement to the proposal.
- John
___
tor-dev mailing list
tor-dev@lists.torproject.o
tries to do. Another difference is that we’ll select
IPs uniformly, instead of by bandwidth weight - I think this doesn’t create
new problems, because being a HSDir is just as intensive.
Could that work? Is it worth pursuing?
- John
___
tor-dev mailing
convince DAs to lend their time.
Thanks,
- John
[1] https://ricochet.im/
[2] It’s part of the design that I can’t accurately count users. My best
guess is “low hundreds, and growing”.
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
For devs,
1) Where can I get a previous version of Tor Bundle for Windows? I'm looking for the version when it jumped from Firefox 24 ESR (or something below Firefox 28.0) to the new Firefox GUI that occurred when going above version 28.0
2) How involved would it be to use a current version
ke and there
> is no problem in having lots of them. People are wondering how well
> these applications scale and whether they are using the Tor network
> the right way. See John Brooks' mail for a small analysis:
> https://moderncrypto.org/mail-archive/messaging/2014/000434.htm
ctl
>
> I've only done small-scale testing of these patches so far. If they
> seems like they might be useful I'll create a trac ticket to merge them.
>
> Cheers,
> Michael
>
> ___
> tor-dev mailing list
>
Hi Piotr,
This page should help:
https://www.torproject.org/getinvolved/volunteer#project-tor
On 04/03/14 15:17, sarni...@student.agh.edu.pl wrote:
Hi everyone,
could you provide some information about your progress on the project?
I am interested in developing the tool, but I don't want to
Hello Nick,
Thanks for your response. This is very helpful and somewhat in line with
my expectations. I will forward this thread to the IETF list, please let
me know if there is more to add.
Thanks John
-Original Message-
From: Nick Mathewson
Reply-To:
Date: Sunday 16 February 2014
there any privacy concerns considering the organisation
could now answer the DNS queries mentioned above. I.e. If a user requested
notatrap.onion without tor configured instead of getting no response the
could be redirected to a site controlled by the new owner of the .onion
domain.
Thanks
John
[1
Hey dgoulet,
Thankfully, your torsocks update seems to work well on OSX! I apologize for not
getting back to you sooner; there were some family issues that kept me busy.
Have you made any progress on torsocks since we talked? I am understanding the
pure C code fairly well at this point. What's
ndows XP, someone
smarter than me can provide a solution for the above Firefox 12 build
issue.
Thanks!
[0] https://git.torproject.org/torbrowser.git
[1]
https://gitweb.torproject.org/user/shondoit/torbrowser.git/tree/personal-build
--
John Crain
johncr...@eml.cc
On Sun, May 6, 201
t
benefits of something like [0,1]?
[0] #3978: "Better TBB about:config settings(?); re: browsing and
loading speed, etc."
https://trac.torproject.org/projects/tor/ticket/3978
[1]
https://trac.torproject.org/projects/tor/attachment/ticket/3978/tbb-ff-pgo.patch
--
John Crain
john
37 matches
Mail list logo
