On 3/26/25 7:45 PM, Hefee wrote:
Hey,
This looks basically ok to me. More below:
thx for this fast reply! Sorry I'm a little bit busy the last days...
Btw. would it be possible to ship a new release the next days? So I can push
this new version to Debian trixie? As the soft freeze is happe
This looks basically ok to me. More below:
On 3/10/25 8:50 AM, Hefee via tor-dev wrote:
Hey,
in Debian we want to enable mutli-arch support for torsocks. To be able to run
different binaries of different archs.
We already splitted libtorsocks into own package, so you can now install
e.g.: torso
It'd be helpful to have more context about the object IDs and what we're
trying to accomplish with them here; why we need/want them in arti but
didn't in c-tor. I'm inferring (maybe incorrectly) that the idea is that
this is effectively letting us multiplex differently-configured
SOCKS->Tor ser
On 3/14/22 14:40, Nick Mathewson wrote:
On Mon, Mar 14, 2022 at 3:18 PM Jim Newsome <mailto:jnews...@torproject.org>> wrote:
On 3/14/22 11:44, Nick Mathewson wrote:
> Currently Tor relays use a 4-byte timestamp (in seconds since
the Unix
> epoch) i
On 3/14/22 11:44, Nick Mathewson wrote:
> Currently Tor relays use a 4-byte timestamp (in seconds since the Unix
> epoch) in their NETINFO cells. Notoriously, such a timestamp will
> overflow on 19 January 2038.
>
> Let's get ahead of the problem and squash this issue now, by expanding
> the t
On 12/11/20 08:04, David Goulet wrote:
> we are talking a good 2-4
> years minimum once the feature is stable thus we have to get this out soon if
> we hope to be useful in the foreseeable future.
Right - the slow feedback cycle of deploying between deploying new
logging and trying to use it is
On 12/7/20 14:06, David Goulet wrote:
> Greetings,
>
> Attached is a proposal from Mike Perry and I. Merge requsest is here:
>
> https://gitlab.torproject.org/tpo/core/torspec/-/merge_requests/22
Disclaimer - As someone not very familiar with how tor load balancing
works today, I might not be the
On 9/22/20 07:10, George Kadianakis wrote:
> George Kadianakis writes:
>
>> tevador writes:
>>
>>> Hi all,
>>>
> Hello,
>
> I have pushed another update to the PoW proposal here:
> https://github.com/asn-d6/torspec/tree/pow-over-intro
> I also (finally) merged it upstream to torspec as proposa
cc tor-dev for real this time :)
On 8/31/20 17:23, Jim Newsome wrote:
> Hi David, (cc tor-dev in case others are interested or know anything
> about it)
>
> I'm told you're the local expert on the linux perf tool :). I'm using it
> to profile sleep times in Shado
