On 12-03-28 06:57 PM, George Kadianakis wrote:
> Hooman writes:
>
>>>>> D) The morphing output is basically identical to the naive shaping. Are
>>>>> you sure you did it right?
>>>> So as mentioned in the report, the original traffic morphing does
On 12-03-28 02:28 AM, Roger Dingledine wrote:
On Mon, Mar 26, 2012 at 03:04:47PM -0400, Hooman wrote:
Can you give us some guesses about next steps for resolving these issues
(or explaining why they aren't actually as worrisome as they appear)?
A) It looks like the transport has no noti
On 12-03-25 09:37 PM, Roger Dingledine wrote:
On Sun, Mar 25, 2012 at 07:18:44PM -0400, Hooman wrote:
In our recent work, SkypeMorph [2], we have tried to use Skype video
communications as our target protocol for protocol obfuscation.
SkypeMorph functionality is similar to Obfsproxy, but the
nefit from this.
Hooman
[1]:https://blog.torproject.org/blog/obfsproxy-next-step-censorship-arms-race
[2]:http://cacr.uwaterloo.ca/techreports/2012/cacr2012-08.pdf
[3]:http://crysp.uwaterloo.ca/software/
[4]:http://developer.skype.com/public/skypekit
[5]:http://developer.skype.com/publi
