Hi,
Just some update,
We fixed this chosen_by_version SIGSEGV error,
And Tania is working on removing XXX comments.
Will keep u updated when we close more issues.
Cheers,
Fan
On Fri, Apr 22, 2016 at 9:14 AM, George Kadianakis
wrote:
> Fan Jiang writes:
>
> > [ text/plain ]
>
2016年4月22日 上午4:54，"George Kadianakis" 写道：
>
> Fan Jiang writes:
>
> > [ text/plain ]
> > On Thu, Apr 21, 2016 at 4:32 AM, George Kadianakis
> > wrote:
> >
> >> Fan Jiang writes:
> >>
> >> > [ text/plain ]
> >> >
On Thu, Apr 21, 2016 at 4:32 AM, George Kadianakis
wrote:
> Fan Jiang writes:
>
> > [ text/plain ]
> > Hi,
> >
> >> Hello Fan and team,
> >>
> >> I think I'm not a big fan of the pending_guard and pending_dir_guard
> >>
come 100%
> with #12538)
>
> #12538 got merged in 0.2.8, so if prop259 gets merged in 0.2.9, by the
> time prop259 becomes active, almost all guards will be dirguards.
>
> So I think it's fine to only consider guards that are dirguards &&
> fast &&
> stable now, since by the time prop259 gets deployed that will be the
> case
> for almost 100% of guards.
>
--
Fan Jiang 蒋帆
Amateur Code Chef
Thoughtworks, Inc.
mobile +86-150-9189-3714
skype f...@torchz.net
___
tor-dev mailing list
tor-dev@lists.torproject.org
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-dev
Hi,
the last mail got rejected by tor-dev, to keep track of this thread,
sending again, sorry for disturbing,
> On Fri, Apr 15, 2016 at 5:37 AM, George Kadianakis
> wrote:
>
>> Fan Jiang writes:
>>
>> > [ text/plain ]
>> > Thanks for the insights.
>
