Karsten Loesing wrote:
> On 08/01/16 16:54, Fabian Keil wrote:
> > Karsten Loesing wrote:
> >
> >> On 07/01/16 18:48, Fabian Keil wrote:
> >>> Looking at "Tor metrics - Relays by platform" [0] one could
> >>> think that the number
Karsten Loesing wrote:
> On 07/01/16 18:48, Fabian Keil wrote:
> > Looking at "Tor metrics - Relays by platform" [0] one could think
> > that the number of "FreeBSD" relays is only slightly lower than the
> > number of "Windows" relay
Nicolas Vigier wrote:
> On Wed, 01 Jul 2015, Fabian Keil wrote:
>
> > Sukhbir Singh wrote:
> >
> > > * Feedback
> > >
> > > This is an early release and there may be serious privacy leaks and
> > > other issues -- please DO NOT recommend
Sukhbir Singh wrote:
> * Feedback
>
> This is an early release and there may be serious privacy leaks and
> other issues -- please DO NOT recommend Tor Messenger to end users; this
> release is only for developers and advanced users who would like to help
> us with testing but understand the ris
Yawning Angel wrote:
> On Mon, 13 Apr 2015 10:14:43 -0400
> Nathan Freitas wrote:
> > One interesting issue is that GoLang 1.4.1, which we are using to
> > cross-compile the Meek and Obfs4 pluggable transports to Android, only
> > supports targeting Android ARM for right now... I assume that wil
Fabian Keil wrote:
> I just submitted the FreeBSD ports for liballium and obfclient:
FYI, the ports have been committed on Saturday:
https://docs.freebsd.org/cgi/getmsg.cgi?fetch=4055628+0+/usr/local/www/db/text/2014/svn-ports-all/20140824.svn-ports-all
Fabian
signature.asc
Description:
Yawning Angel wrote:
> I just tagged obfsclient v0.0.2 (Release)
No known problems on FreeBSD so far. The ports PR has been updated:
http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=187927
Fabian
--
2014-04-12/13: Protest against mass surveillance in Cologne, Germany
http://cologne.stopwatchingus.in
Yawning Angel wrote:
> On Mon, 17 Mar 2014 13:26:25 +0100
> Fabian Keil wrote:
>
> > My pleasure. Unfortunately I apparently missed one issue on FreeBSD
> > 8.4:
> > https://redports.org/~fk/20140317110212-48719-187908/obfsclient-0.0.1.log
>
> Ah, that's
Yawning Angel wrote:
> I just tagged the obfsclient v0.0.1 (Release)
>
> Download at: https://github.com/Yawning/obfsclient/releases/tag/v0.0.1
[...]
> Special thanks to Fabian Keil for help testing and fixing the various
> release candidates.
My pleasure. Unfortunately I appare
David Fifield wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 27, 2014 at 12:50:35PM +0100, Fabian Keil wrote:
> > Yawning Angel wrote:
> > > Where: https://github.com/Yawning/obfsclient/releases/tag/v0.0.1-rc1
> >
> > Also building fine on the various FreeBSD releases supported by Redp
Yawning Angel wrote:
> Due to a moment of surprising productivity, I have a release candidate
> of obfsclient available now. For those of you that missed the last
> thread regarding this, it is a C++11 client implementation of
> obfs2, obfs3, and ScrambleSuit that works as a drop in replacement
Yawning Angel wrote:
> On Mon, 17 Feb 2014 19:34:36 +
> Yawning Angel wrote:
>
> > I will address the GCC build issues when I'm done working on that.
> > The system gcc on 9.1p10 is ancient (4.2.1), and does not support
> > C++11, so I would have to install gcc from ports.
>
> I haven't i
Fabian Keil wrote:
> Yawning Angel wrote:
>
> > On Fri, 14 Feb 2014 16:17:59 +
> > Yawning Angel wrote:
> >
> > > What the. Ok. I'll look at that, though it is a "this should never
> > > happen" sort of situation. I think I
Yawning Angel wrote:
> On Fri, 14 Feb 2014 16:17:59 +
> Yawning Angel wrote:
>
> > What the. Ok. I'll look at that, though it is a "this should never
> > happen" sort of situation. I think I'll end up setting up a FreeBSD VM
> > since my FreeBSD box is on 9.1p10.
>
> Fixed in commit 600a
Yawning Angel wrote:
> On Fri, 14 Feb 2014 12:00:40 +0100
> Fabian Keil wrote:
> > > Please let me know if it's still broken/if I've missed anything.
> > from /home/fk/git/obfsclient/src/main.cc:49:
> > /home/fk/git/obfsclient/src/schwanenlied/pt/sc
Yawning Angel wrote:
> On Thu, 13 Feb 2014 14:06:39 +0100
> Fabian Keil wrote:
> > Trying to build it on FreeBSD 11.0-CURRENT I get (after a couple
> > of other issues):
>
> FreeBSD has Clang as the default compiler right?
Right. ATM, I'm using:
fk@r500 ~ $
Yawning Angel wrote:
> obfsclient (https://github.com/yawning/obfsclient) now also supports the
> latest and greatest in pluggable transport technology in the form of
> ScrambleSuit.
>
> All 3 transports pass the "Can I watch youtube over it" test.
[...]
> Comments, Questions, Feedback apprecia
Leo Unglaub wrote:
> On 2013-03-11 04:10, Damian Johnson wrote:
> > Sweet! Always glad to hear that people find it to be useful.
>
> yes, it is very usefull. There are just two issues that cause arm to
> crash if you resize the terminal during some events. It simply freezes
> arm. But thats a
Debamitro Chakraborti wrote:
> I think adding http proxy support to tor sounds more interesting. But there
> seems to be a looong discussion on ticket #6060 whether to add this
> functionality inside tor or not. What is the final roadmap, if any?
From the outside my impression after reading the
Ian Goldberg wrote:
> On Sun, Jul 01, 2012 at 05:29:04PM +0200, Fabian Keil wrote:
> > > So if only a handful of clients
> > > have upgraded to a TBB that supports it (none does at this time),
> > > they'll stand out.
Ian Goldberg wrote:
> On Sat, Jun 30, 2012 at 07:03:19PM +0200, Fabian Keil wrote:
> > Nick Mathewson wrote:
> >
> > > IMPLEMENTED IN 0.2.3.x
> >
> > >174 Optimistic Data for Tor: Server Side
> > >181 Optimistic Data for Tor: Client
Nick Mathewson wrote:
> IMPLEMENTED IN 0.2.3.x
>174 Optimistic Data for Tor: Server Side
>181 Optimistic Data for Tor: Client Side
>
> This one is a performance hack that hasn't seen its full impact
> yet. Starting with Tor 0.2.3.x, clients MAY send data to the
> exit
Nathan Freitas wrote:
> Since the dawn of Orbot, way back in 2009, the onion routing robot app
> has been built using an unwieldy combination of tools, based on an
> extremely out of date method for cross-compiling C code for Android/ARM.
> In the 1.x era of Android, there was no Native Developme
Ian Goldberg wrote:
> Anyway, here's the client-side sibling proposal to the
> already-implemented 174. It cuts down time-to-first-byte for HTTP
> requests by 25 to 50 percent, so long as your SOCKS client (e.g.
> webfetch, polipo, etc.) is patched to support it. (With that kind of
> speedup, I
Roger Dingledine wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 21, 2011 at 10:20:22PM +0200, Fabian Keil wrote:
> > I assume it can take several seconds for the exit relay to stop sending
> > data and the Tor client has to continue reading from the stream to keep
> > the circuit usable. Is that c
While experimenting with Tor v0.2.3.4-alpha's "optimistic data" and
thus keeping an eye on the logs, I noticed that I get a lot of the
following messages (with and without "optimistic data"):
Sep 20 13:47:57.428 [debug] {APP} connection_edge_process_relay_cell(): Now
seen 8236 relay cells here (c
Fabian Keil wrote:
> and...@torproject.org wrote:
>
> > On Fri, Jun 10, 2011 at 07:12:25PM +, ja...@appelbaum.net wrote 1.7K
> > bytes in 39 lines about:
> > : I did not suggest a backdoor! I suggested a method of remotely helping
> >
> > This comes ac
and...@torproject.org wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 10, 2011 at 07:12:25PM +, ja...@appelbaum.net wrote 1.7K
> bytes in 39 lines about:
> : I did not suggest a backdoor! I suggested a method of remotely helping
>
> This comes across as "it's not a backdoor, it's a highly secured front
> door that onl
Ian Goldberg wrote:
> On Sat, Jun 04, 2011 at 08:42:33PM +0200, Fabian Keil wrote:
> > Ian Goldberg wrote:
> > > Overview:
> > >
> > > This proposal (as well as its already-implemented sibling concerning the
> > > server side) aims to reduce the la
Ian Goldberg wrote:
> Anyway, here's the client-side sibling proposal to the
> already-implemented 174. It cuts down time-to-first-byte for HTTP
> requests by 25 to 50 percent, so long as your SOCKS client (e.g.
> webfetch, polipo, etc.) is patched to support it. (With that kind of
> speedup, I
Nathan Freitas wrote:
> On 04/16/2011 06:24 AM, Fabian Keil wrote:
> > This seems to be (or based on) Privoxy 3.0.12 released in 2009.
> > What's the rationale for not using a more recent version?
>
> At this point, that is the latest version we have successfully
&g
Nathan Freitas wrote:
> Author: n8fr8
> Date: 2011-04-15 16:38:53 + (Fri, 15 Apr 2011)
> New Revision: 24630
> Log:
> adding binaries to res/raw folder
> ___
> Added: svn:mime-type
>+ application/octet-stream
>
> Added: pr
Tomas Touceda wrote:
> On 22:10 Wed 13 Apr , Fabian Keil wrote:
> > Tomas Touceda wrote:
> >
> > > Author: chiiph
> > > Date: 2011-04-13 19:55:14 + (Wed, 13 Apr 2011)
> > > New Revision: 24618
> > >
> > > Modified:
> >
Tomas Touceda wrote:
> Author: chiiph
> Date: 2011-04-13 19:55:14 + (Wed, 13 Apr 2011)
> New Revision: 24618
>
> Modified:
>website/trunk/projects/en/vidalia.wml
> Log:
> Update Vidalia's project page
>
> Modified: website/trunk/projects/en/vidalia.wml
>
34 matches
Mail list logo
