Granted that this is an experimental implementation (as acknowleged by the
Boring devs) in a very different protocol with different tradeoffs.
On Thu, May 19, 2016 at 2:42 PM Yawning Angel
wrote:
> On Thu, 19 May 2016 17:21:47 +
> Deirdre Connolly wrote:
>
> > Not sure i
Not sure if this has been noted before on this thread, but the BoringSSL
team is working on something very similar:
https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/#/c/7962/
On Thu, May 19, 2016 at 1:01 PM Yawning Angel
wrote:
> On Tue, 17 May 2016 17:49:46 + (UTC)
> lukep wrote:
> > > [snip]
>
