Re: [tor-dev] Tor Project Idea | GSOC 2015 | Panopticlick | fake fingerprint

2015-02-11 Thread Andrew F
I think I like this idea.. Well done. On Wednesday, February 11, 2015, Rohit Dua <8ohit@gmail.com> wrote: > Hello > > I'm Rohit from India, aspiring for gsoc-2015(TOR). This will be my 2nd > consecutive year for gsoc participation. Previous mediawiki. Project:BUB > tool

Re: [tor-dev] Help hacking Mumble

2014-02-24 Thread Andrew F
Any movement on this? anything new? On Sun, Feb 9, 2014 at 9:52 PM, Matt wrote: > On Fri, 07 Feb 2014 09:54:35 +0400 > meejah wrote: > > > What I would suggest: > > > > 1. change ConnectDialog so that it always uses not-yet-looked-up > >QHostAddresses (perhaps only if a proxy is enabled)

Re: [tor-dev] Help hacking Mumble

2014-02-06 Thread Andrew F
Matt, What are you thinking about this? On Thu, Feb 6, 2014 at 6:06 PM, Matt wrote: > On Thu, 30 Jan 2014 22:01:18 + > Matt wrote: > > Here is one of the Mumble developers' take on the issue: > > > > I don't know where @zanethomas's post went, but I just want to clarify > > what needs to

Re: [tor-dev] Help hacking Mumble

2014-01-31 Thread Andrew F
Matt, have you gotten any response? On Thu, Jan 30, 2014 at 10:01 PM, Matt wrote: > If you're into C++ or Qt, we could use some help. Mumble[0] is a free > software VoIP application that various people have had success > using with Tor. One problem using Mumble with Tor is that Mumble > doesn't

Re: [tor-dev] Reminder: Attentive Otter IM Bundle Meeting in 1h

2013-10-09 Thread Andrew F
How about a specific time? with the time zone indicated. thanks. On Wed, Oct 9, 2013 at 10:11 AM, Jurre van Bergen wrote: > On 10/09/2013 06:04 PM, Tom Lowenthal wrote: > > Hello hello, > > > > This is your roughly 60-minute reminder that we'll be comparing > > proposals for the IM browser bund

Re: [tor-dev] OnionMail First Test

2013-09-18 Thread Andrew F
Josef, Spot on. On Wed, Sep 18, 2013 at 1:23 AM, wrote: > Why you guys use JAVA for such a security concerned email client? > > JAVA itself isn't secure and most relayable computers don't have > a virtual machine. You know JavaSnoop and vm-hookers like that? > > Just rewrite it into plain C im

Re: [tor-dev] Chrome browser and sand boxing.

2013-05-23 Thread Andrew F
Thanks. On Thu, May 23, 2013 at 5:00 PM, Andrew Lewman wrote: > On Thu, 23 May 2013 15:35:28 + > Andrew F wrote: > > > I have Googled and searched the Tor website, but I have not found any > > information on chrome's sandbox feature and Tor. Specifically wi

[tor-dev] Chrome browser and sand boxing.

2013-05-23 Thread Andrew F
I have Googled and searched the Tor website, but I have not found any information on chrome's sandbox feature and Tor. Specifically with flash. Is there any information out their on this? Thanks ___ tor-dev mailing list tor-dev@lists.torproject.org http

Re: [tor-dev] Discussion on the crypto migration plan of the identity keys of Hidden Services

2013-05-17 Thread Andrew F
George, I would definitely create an extended transition time frame. 6 months or a year where both keys will work. just make it clear there is a cut off date. And I think Adrelanos's concept is a valid one. Since we may need to do this again, why not put a structure in place that facilitate

Re: [tor-dev] Tor Launcher settings UI feedback request

2013-05-03 Thread Andrew F
On the contrary, I think you should list them all under an menu item called advanced connections. Users who need these connections will have them and those that don't, probably won't know what they are and thats ok. On Fri, May 3, 2013 at 5:41 PM, Runa A. Sandvik wrote: > On Fri, May 3, 2013 at