Re: [tor-dev] Please consider allowing /48 for VirtualAddrNetworkIPv6

2016-09-17 Thread Alex Elsayed
On Sat, 17 Sep 2016 04:45:00 -0400, grarpamp wrote: > On Fri, Sep 16, 2016 at 6:10 PM, Alex Elsayed > wrote: >>> (Yes, there is a typo in the last IPv6 address as well. >>> https://trac.torproject.org/projects/tor/ticket/20153 ) > > Yes Tor is making some quite bad

Re: [tor-dev] Please consider allowing /48 for VirtualAddrNetworkIPv6

2016-09-16 Thread Alex Elsayed
On Sat, 17 Sep 2016 07:46:05 +1000, teor wrote: >> On 17 Sep 2016, at 05:20, grarpamp >> wrote: >> >> On Fri, Sep 16, 2016 at 5:13 AM, Alex Elsayed >> wrote: >>> Hi, I'm using Tor in transparent mode, and I'm running into a rather >>&

[tor-dev] Please consider allowing /48 for VirtualAddrNetworkIPv6

2016-09-16 Thread Alex Elsayed
Hi, I'm using Tor in transparent mode, and I'm running into a rather inconvenient behavior. VirtualAddrNetworkIPv6 refuses to parse unless the network address given is a /40 or broader. However, IPv6 ULA, which makes it very easy to give Tor its own subnet no-strings-attached, strictly grants a /4