Re: [tor-dev] New paper by Goldberg, Stebila, and Ustaoglu with proposed circuit handshake

2011-05-12 Thread Adam Langley
donna.c with room for improvement. Cheers AGL -- Adam Langley a...@imperialviolet.org http://www.imperialviolet.org ___ tor-dev mailing list tor-dev@lists.torproject.org https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-dev

Re: [tor-dev] New paper by Goldberg, Stebila, and Ustaoglu with proposed circuit handshake

2011-05-12 Thread Adam Langley
tforms, though.  Any suggestions there? The 32-bit C version will function for these platforms and they're only clients, right? So if they're slower it's dramatically less important. I'm sure that I can also tune up the 32-bit version should there be anyone using it. Cheers

Re: [tor-dev] New paper by Goldberg, Stebila, and Ustaoglu with proposed circuit handshake

2011-05-12 Thread Adam Langley
http://www.imperialviolet.org/2010/12/21/eccspeed.html Cheers AGL -- Adam Langley a...@imperialviolet.org http://www.imperialviolet.org ___ tor-dev mailing list tor-dev@lists.torproject.org https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-dev

Re: [tor-dev] xxx-draft-spec-for-TLS-normalization.txt

2011-02-21 Thread Adam Langley
m generation could be made much better then it's a reasonable answer, at the cost of more code complexity and no collateral damage. I suspect that the cat and mouse game only stops when the collateral damage is too large, or all self-signed certs are blocked. AGL -- Adam Langley

Re: [tor-dev] xxx-draft-spec-for-TLS-normalization.txt

2011-02-21 Thread Adam Langley
HQORbw 2Tv8sNnrOp92IWRVeZl3p+zJ+c1XvKXFPPyL59d6o+SWPkb/2RP9X5SUOwkCAwEA AaMhMB8wHQYDVR0lBBYwFAYIKwYBBQUHAwEGCCsGAQUFBwMCMA0GCSqGSIb3DQEB BAUAA4GBAGoaU8ZXqzke+qfb3yYpfY68V0wVTeqiJApLRnQZ/YBfdvpapqr5mfus AoWTWDsqL0yQPAUaD7KngYhIO2FPNWV9Wy8gC8TtX6Zkr3s/4OiBXMBdwxVZ/Rab J2JGtyI2s0zILEXcwtQq1fM86Z4RCAOpz2EuIBbzmxcdL