On Tue, Sep 10, 2024 at 6:26 PM Jim Newsome wrote:
>
> It'd be helpful to have more context about the object IDs and what we're
> trying to accomplish with them here; why we need/want them in arti but
> didn't in c-tor. I'm inferring (maybe incorrectly) that the idea is that
> this is effectively
It'd be helpful to have more context about the object IDs and what we're
trying to accomplish with them here; why we need/want them in arti but
didn't in c-tor. I'm inferring (maybe incorrectly) that the idea is that
this is effectively letting us multiplex differently-configured
SOCKS->Tor ser
On Tue, Sep 10, 2024 at 9:25 AM Q Misell via tor-dev
wrote:
>
> Is there a reason why this proposal extends the existing username/password
> auth, instead of defining a new SOCKS5 authentication type? c.f.
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/rfc1928#section-3
Indeed there is! The one I was
Is there a reason why this proposal extends the existing username/password
auth, instead of defining a new SOCKS5 authentication type? c.f.
https://e.as207960.net/w4bdyj/5dQ6fT3QLm2aTfUx
--
Any statements contained in this email are personal to the author and are
not ne
