Re: [tor-dev] DNS-over-HTTPS (DOH) in Firefox/Torbrowser

Georg Koppen: > nusenu: >> Hi, >> >> since Mozilla did tests [0] on DOH [1] in Firefox I was wondering >> if Torbrowser developers have put any thought into that as well? > > Actually, the study did not get done yet. The start date is scheduled > for June 4th, see: https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/sho

Re: [tor-dev] Support for full DNS resolution and DNSSEC validation

Christian Hofer: > On Tue, 2020-06-09 at 23:54 +0200, nusenu wrote: >>> However, thinking about it, DNSSEC might be useful for caching DNS >>> records on the client side. >> >> caching has privacy implications and is therefore a risk. >> > > So you are saying that caching is not an option in any c

Re: [tor-dev] Support for full DNS resolution and DNSSEC validation

On Tue, 2020-06-09 at 23:54 +0200, nusenu wrote: > > However, thinking about it, DNSSEC might be useful for caching DNS > > records on the client side. > > caching has privacy implications and is therefore a risk. > So you are saying that caching is not an option in any case, right? Can I kindly

[tor-dev] #32888 IPv6 and 'Address' option

Trac describes that "we should also log [for] IPv4 and IPv6: the Address torrc option" and as tor(1) states, 'Address' takes only an IPv4 address and port. So what is suggested here? Make 'Address' support IPv6 to be consistent with other opt