Re: [tor-dev] Proposal XXX: FlashFlow: A Secure Speed Test for Tor (Parent Proposal)

2020-05-16 Thread teor
> On 16 May 2020, at 16:05, Mike Perry wrote: > >> On 4/23/20 1:48 PM, Matt Traudt wrote: >> >> 5.4 Other Changes/Investigations/Ideas >> >> - How can FlashFlow data be used in a way that doesn't lead to poor >> load balancing given the following items that lead to non-uniform >> client beha

Re: [tor-dev] Chutney code refactoring

2020-05-16 Thread c
On Fri, 15 May 2020 11:20:54 +1000 teor wrote: > You could try deleting functions, and then running tor's > "make test-network-all". If that test still passes, then the code is probably > unused (in practice). > > Chutney's CI does a few more tests for different tor versions, but I'm pretty > su

Re: [tor-dev] Chutney code refactoring

2020-05-16 Thread c
On Thu, 14 May 2020 19:58:45 -0400 Nick Mathewson wrote: > isInExpectedDirInfoDocs looks like it might once have done something useful. My impression is to remove it unless we anticipate needing it in the near future. > configure and restart and wait_for_bootstrap are all in use; they are > inv

Re: [tor-dev] Support for full DNS resolution and DNSSEC validation

2020-05-16 Thread Christian Hofer
On Fri, 2020-05-15 at 14:30 -0400, Roger Dingledine wrote: > On Fri, May 15, 2020 at 05:39:23PM +0200, Christian Hofer wrote: > > Final remarks. When I started, I didn't expect it to get this big, > > and > > frankly, if I had known before, I might not have even started. > > However, > > I learned