Hi,
> On 2 Aug 2019, at 13:02, NOC wrote:
>
> That would imply that guard relays run at 100% capacity which i can't confirm
> for any of my guards.
I have run guards at 100% before, but it's not ideal.
Generally, Tor load-balances traffic to make sure that clients get consistently
good bandw
That would imply that guard relays run at 100% capacity which i can't
confirm for any of my guards. Also seeing decline in usage would maybe
give a incentive for some relay operators to configure IPv6 in their
torrc, because there are thousands of relays which do have IPv6
connectivity, but the
Hi,
> On 2 Aug 2019, at 09:20, NOC wrote:
>
> I see this staying longer with IPv4 longer than we should also problematic,
> we are at the point that there are providers out there who do have more
> clients than IPv4 space which results in having them making carrier grade
> NAT. Some of them h
Hi,
I see this staying longer with IPv4 longer than we should also
problematic, we are at the point that there are providers out there who
do have more clients than IPv4 space which results in having them making
carrier grade NAT. Some of them have the problem that their NAT gear
gets maxed o
