[tor-dev] Solving World's Tor Users Being Blocked by Websites (was: Tor exit bridges)

2019-05-07 Thread grarpamp
On 5/7/19, nusenu wrote: > > juanjo: >> Tor relays are public and easily blocked by IP. To connect to Tor >> network users where Tor is censored have to use bridges and even PTs. >> But, what happens on the exit? Many websites block Tor IPs so using >> it to access "clearweb" is not possible. Shou

[tor-dev] Controller: text connection vs SNMP

2019-05-07 Thread grarpamp
Speaking of MIBs and management, was SNMP ever seriously looked at back when desire for a control mechanism evolved? If I recall, agent libs and clients weren't wished as middleware, thus demurring to a text connection shell interface. Though commercial routers have both, the shell connection is us

Re: [tor-dev] Tor exit bridges

2019-05-07 Thread Matthew Finkel
On Tue, May 7, 2019 at 5:35 PM juanjo wrote: > Tor relays are public and easily blocked by IP. To connect to Tor > network users where Tor is censored have to use bridges and even PTs. > But, what happens on the exit? Many websites block Tor IPs so using it > to access "clearweb" is not possible.

Re: [tor-dev] [RFC] control-spec: Specify add/remove/view client auth commands (client-side).

2019-05-07 Thread grarpamp
On 5/7/19, Suphanat Chunhapanya wrote: > That's cool. But according to what dgoulet proposed, if we use both > ONION_CLIENT_AUTH_ADD > and ONION_SERVICE_AUTH_ADD. The latter will sound like it's an > authentication of the service not the client. At least for me :) And or maybe that seem more like

Re: [tor-dev] Tor exit bridges

2019-05-07 Thread nusenu
juanjo: > Tor relays are public and easily blocked by IP. To connect to Tor > network users where Tor is censored have to use bridges and even PTs. > But, what happens on the exit? Many websites block Tor IPs so using > it to access "clearweb" is not possible. Should we allow and start > using "e

[tor-dev] Tor exit bridges

2019-05-07 Thread juanjo
Tor relays are public and easily blocked by IP. To connect to Tor network users where Tor is censored have to use bridges and even PTs. But, what happens on the exit? Many websites block Tor IPs so using it to access "clearweb" is not possible. Should we allow and start using "exit bridges"? In

[tor-dev] Fuck You Van Gegel

2019-05-07 Thread Mark Kepler
Fuck You Van Gegel, you dumb fuck. You think you can post stupid shit to our lists? I'm going to stop you from postiing you dumb motherfucker. I'm going to eat you alive. You're a dumb cocksucking faggot and I enjoyed fucking your mother in her face. I yelled FACE FUCK while I was doing it BITCH

Re: [tor-dev] [RFC] control-spec: Specify add/remove/view client auth commands (client-side).

2019-05-07 Thread George Kadianakis
George Kadianakis writes: > Hello list, > > here is a control spec patch for adding v3 client auth commands to > add/remove/view clients from the client-side (so Tor Browser -> Tor): > > https://github.com/torproject/torspec/pull/81/commits/3a26880e80617210b4729f96664ef9f0345b0b7

Re: [tor-dev] [RFC] control-spec: Specify add/remove/view client auth commands (client-side).

2019-05-07 Thread Suphanat Chunhapanya
(1) On 5/7/19 2:16 AM, grarpamp wrote: > ONION_CLIENT_AUTH_ADD > > is most clear... ONION (ok, what about onion), > CLIENT (ok, what about client), AUTH (ok, and...) > ADD (aha yes do that). And docs are self > ordering into nice sections. > > > ONION_CLIENT_ADD_AUTH > > doesn't follow because it