On 3/4/19, Kevin Gallagher wrote:
> Recently I've been
> working on creating a "Tor Friendliness Scanner" (TFS), or a scanner
> that will measure what features of a given website are broken
> (non-functional) when accessed on the Tor Browser (TB), along with
> actionable suggestions to improve it.
Hi Kevin,
It may or may not be of any use, but here is a content from an etherpad
that a number of Tor folks worked on a while back regarding 'tor
friendly sites".
Sounds like you have a robust way of going about this, so this is
provided as food for thought.
peace
gunner
Designing a web site t
On Mon, Mar 04, 2019 at 03:58:58PM -0500, Kevin Gallagher wrote:
> To generate a method of determining ground-truth, we decided to modify* the
> Firefox (FF) browser to log all of the steps of the creation of the Content
> Tree (also called the DOM tree)
>[...]
> We have moved ahead with developmen
Hi,
> We have moved ahead with development (though have not yet finished it) and
> are (hopefully) very close to a working prototype. I was wondering if there
> was feedback on this method, or if anyone can consider an angle we have not
> that would either make the TFS more robust, easier to crea
Hello tor-dev!
My name is Kevin and I'm a PhD student at NYU. Recently I've been
working on creating a "Tor Friendliness Scanner" (TFS), or a scanner
that will measure what features of a given website are broken
(non-functional) when accessed on the Tor Browser (TB), along with
actionable sug
Hi tor-dev@ mailing list,
I have Proposal 299, also known as "Preferring IPv4 or IPv6 based on IP
Version Failure Count" which makes ClientAutoIPv6ORPort take into
account IPv4 and IPv6 failures.
An older version of this document is available here:
https://gitweb.torproject.org/torspec.git/t
