On 05/09/2018 03:50 PM, George Kadianakis wrote:
> I thought about this some more and discussed it with haxxpop on IRC. In
> the end, I think that perhaps starting with just desc auth and then in
> the future implementing intro auth is also an acceptable plan forward.
I think we have two more th
Hi,
On 09/05/18 13:08, juga wrote:
> after nick, irl and teor reviewed the last version i sent [1], i paste
> below a new version of the specification versions 1.1.0 and 1.0.0.
> It's the same version as commit
> https://github.com/juga0/torspec/commit/c7cdfd4fcb4b5623e1407e2bec38e9fdf7b70e6b.
Aw
Hi,
after nick, irl and teor reviewed the last version i sent [1], i paste
below a new version of the specification versions 1.1.0 and 1.0.0.
It's the same version as commit
https://github.com/juga0/torspec/commit/c7cdfd4fcb4b5623e1407e2bec38e9fdf7b70e6b.
The main question that came up was whethe
Mike Perry writes:
> Mike Perry:
>> Heyo.
>>
>> We're going to have a meeting to discuss Proposal 291. See this thread:
>> https://lists.torproject.org/pipermail/tor-dev/2018-April/013053.html
>
> Ok, we had this meeting. High level (ammended) action items are:
>
> 1. Use patches in https://trac
George Kadianakis writes:
> Suphanat Chunhapanya writes:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> On 04/28/2018 06:19 AM, teor wrote:
Or should we require the service to enable both for all clients?
If you want to let the service be able to enable one while disable the
other, do you have any opinion o
