Re: [tor-dev] Is there strictly a one-to-one BW scanner to BW auth relationship?

2018-03-23 Thread Matthew Finkel
On Fri, Mar 23, 2018 at 08:21:38PM -0400, Roger Dingledine wrote: > On Fri, Mar 23, 2018 at 08:13:59PM -0400, Rob Jansen wrote: > > I understand that the current bandwidth measurement system is far from > > ideal, but I am wondering about how the current system works. Does each > > bandwidth auth

Re: [tor-dev] Is there strictly a one-to-one BW scanner to BW auth relationship?

2018-03-23 Thread Roger Dingledine
On Fri, Mar 23, 2018 at 08:13:59PM -0400, Rob Jansen wrote: > I understand that the current bandwidth measurement system is far from ideal, > but I am wondering about how the current system works. Does each bandwidth > authority also run a bandwidth scanner? Or is it possible that the results >

[tor-dev] Is there strictly a one-to-one BW scanner to BW auth relationship?

2018-03-23 Thread Rob Jansen
Hi, I understand that the current bandwidth measurement system is far from ideal, but I am wondering about how the current system works. Does each bandwidth authority also run a bandwidth scanner? Or is it possible that the results from a bandwidth scanner is supplied to multiple authorities?

[tor-dev] The case for Tor-over-QUIC

2018-03-23 Thread Mike Perry
In Rome, I held a session about network protocol upgrades. My intent was to cover the switch to two guards, conflux, datagram transports, and QUIC. We ended up touching only briefly on everything but QUIC, but we went into enough depth on QUIC itself that it was a worthwhile and very productive ses